• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET (SUZHOU) CO.,LTD. MAQUET; STABILIZER, HEART

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET (SUZHOU) CO.,LTD. MAQUET; STABILIZER, HEART Back to Search Results
Model Number ACROBAT-I STABILIZER
Device Problem Mechanical Problem (1384)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/24/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The hospital reported that during a coronary artery bypass procedure, acrobat-i stabilizer main body of the holder is broken, the operation was completed by replacing with the same equipment, and there's no patient effect, the product is from the lot 3000186224.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Trackwise id: (b)(4).The investigation has been started since the complaint was received, the following contents have been conducted: 1.Dhr review: the dhr have been reviewed, there¿s no deficiency identified from production relevant to the acrobat-i stabilizer mount damage prior to this complaint.All the products passed 100% visual and function inspection, which demonstrate the housing mount has no flaws/crack etc.Appearance defect, and all the products were simulate to be fixed on the blade by locking the jaw with no breakage.Raw material (b)(4) was checked and supplier certified that the materials used are conforming to drawing requirement.(b)(4) housing mount supplier dhr was checked, and the injection parameter and product inspection was found normal and no non-conformity observed.(b)(4).3.Randomly checked 800 ea (b)(4) housing mount from another lot 3000173023, there's no flaws/crack etc.Appearance defect observed.The radius on the housing mount has also been checked, the radius is conforming to the drawing requirement.4.Device was received on mar.7th, below evaluations were conducted: 1) visual inspection there¿s no obvious cosmetic defects found on the housing mount, and the fracture did not appear to have propagated along a knit line, flow mark or parting line.Which is same with the hospital feedback, there¿s no visual appearance defect on the mount part.2) the dimension of the fractured chips and 15ea housing mount from batch#:3000207418 was measured, the dimensions are within drawing specification and no abnormal was found.3) simulation test to follow labeling instruction of using regarding mount and dismount test on maquet retractor was performed for two devices from same lot.The device was hooked on the retractor, then locking the lever and tighten the knob and link arm.Repeat the test for 30 times, and check the physical of the mount between each test.The test result indicated no any mount damage or fracture observed, which indicated no fracture risk under normal using.4) fracture simulation test was performed from a random lot without this complaint.To make the housing mount be fractured need to apply extreme strength even put the weight of the body on it, which indicated no housing mount fracture risk under normal using.5) fracture force and locking force was studied with 15 ea (b)(4) housing mount from lot 3000100036.It¿s indicated that the jaw locking force is around 285 n and with 1 ppm chance would reach 324 n.The breakage force mean is about 747 n and with 1 ppm chance the breakage force be lower to 457 n.Further capability of jaw locking force was studied as well, and no probability to result in the mount anterior portion fracture in normal use was observed.Based on above investigation, no physical or dimension deficiency indicating or contribute to the report failure was found on the reported device; the supplier certified that material meet drawing requirements.The simulation mount and dismount test follow labeling instruction did not indicate any failure.Fracture simulation test indicated extreme strength is needed to break the housing mount.Detail fracture force study also indicated no probability to result in the mount anterior portion fracture in normal use.The event occurred during the use of the device and the procedural operation is unavailable for our review.With the available information, it is not possible to determine if the device was used in accordance with the labeling in regards to the reported failure.The most probable root cause of the anterior portion fracture would be much force used during adjusting the stabilizer or the anterior portion was fixed during removing the stabilizer from the retractor.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAQUET
Type of Device
STABILIZER, HEART
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET (SUZHOU) CO.,LTD.
no.158 fang zhou road
suzhou industrial park
suzhou
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAQUET (SUZHOU) CO.,LTD.
no.158 fang zhou road
suzhou industrial park
suzhou
Manufacturer Contact
lu helena
no.158 fang zhou road
suzhou industrial park
suzhou 
MDR Report Key13866088
MDR Text Key296804716
Report Number3007417753-2022-00010
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/24/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/23/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/02/2023
Device Model NumberACROBAT-I STABILIZER
Device Catalogue NumberC-OM-10000
Device Lot Number3000186224
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/07/2022
Date Manufacturer Received03/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/03/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight71 KG
Patient RaceAsian
-
-