Model Number IP-HD-EC-VIDEO-EXT |
Device Problem
Device Fell (4014)
|
Patient Problem
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 03/15/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial report ref to natus complaint (b)(4).The customer reported that the arm of a ergojust cart holding the monitor and camera fell and hurt a nurse.The customer stated they didn't seem loose when it fell off.The adverse event questionnaire was sent to the tech service for the customer.The customer returned the questionnaire.Per questionnaire, the customer reported the staff was transporting the equipment to the patients room when the arm of the cart holding the device's screen and camera broke, and hitting the staff on the lower right arm.The injured staff sought medical attention.Technical service requested images of the damaged cart and staff injuries if possible.Risk analysis and further investiagtion is ongoing.Per (b)(4) complaint histories are reviewed routinely per quality system requirements and any complaint trends are assessed and documented as part of these reviews.No complaint trends have been identified.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the arm of the cart fell and hit a nurse on the arm.The nurse was transporting equipment to a patients room at the time of the incident.The nurse sought medical attention for a lower right arm injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Follow up report 002 ref to natus complaint# (b)(4).Qms-002413 rev 03 dated 11 may 22 documents the folllowing investigation results: video extension was returned intact, none of the welds at the base of the assembly were broken.The slot nuts were not installed into the slots on the cart per proper assembly procedures.If the nuts were installed in the slots the entire mast would need to be lifted until the nuts were clear of the slots for it to potentially fall.If the screws came out of the nuts the mast could also fall, but the nuts then fall down into the slots and are not easily retrievable.The wear on the nuts and the mast from pictures sent by the customer further confirms that the nuts were outside of the slots.The investigation concluded that the root cause/probable cause was an inproper installation of the mast.Per (b)(4) complaint histories are reviewed routinely per quality system requirements and any complaint trends are assessed and documented as part of these reviews.Service repair investigations will be conducted during the repair process and trend data will be reviewed per (b)(4).Faillure confirmed: yes.Investigation result code: neuro sbu|assembly error.Closure rationale: complaint verified, being tracked as a trend.Based on evaluation of this complaint there is no safety risk of harm, individual complaint related to issue stated.Complaint will be included in trending data for further review and investigation if needed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Follow up report 001 ref to natus complaint# (b)(4).Section d4 updated ref ip-hd-ec-video-ext, udi: (b)(4).The customer provided photos of the damaged cart and arm.The customer is unable to provide photos of the nurse's injury.Case tpi-2455 was created for engineering review.Acceptable risk associated with the complaint as per line 6.11 in doc-010378 xltek eeg psg risk analysis spreadsheet.No death or serious injury, considered a customer inconvenience.Manufacturing date: nov-22-2019.Install date: feb-13-2020.Investigation still ongoing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|