• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NEURAVI LTD. EMBOTRAP III 5 MM X 22 MM; EMBOTRAP III REVASCULARIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NEURAVI LTD. EMBOTRAP III 5 MM X 22 MM; EMBOTRAP III REVASCULARIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ET309522
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 03/10/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported by a healthcare professional that a patient underwent mechanical thrombectomy of a middle cerebral artery (mca) (distal m1 segment) occlusion with a 5mm x 22mm embotrap iii (et309522/21j113av) and a 5mm x 37mm embotrap iii (et309537/21l196av) and experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) immediately post-procedure.It was reported that the patient is hospitalized.The treating physician commented that there is a high possibility that perforations were made with wires.Details of the procedure: a phenom 21 microcatheter (medtronic) was delivered to the target position.The 5mm x 22mm embotrap iii was then deployed at the distal m1 segment of the mca.Three passes were performed with the device.Then, a 5mm x 37mm embotrap iii was then utilized.Recanalization was achieved, and the procedure was completed.After that, a sah was found.The devices were allegedly used according to the instructions for use (ifu).Additional information received indicated that the treating physician commented that ¿there is a possibility that perforations were made with wires but, it is higher possible that perforations were made with the complaint et iii than that.¿.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).This is one of two products involved with the complaint and the associated manufacturer report numbers are 3011370111-2022-00032.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Complaint conclusion: it was reported by a healthcare professional that a patient underwent mechanical thrombectomy of a middle cerebral artery (mca) (distal m1 segment) occlusion with a 5mm x 22mm embotrap iii (et309522/21j113av) and a 5mm x 37mm embotrap iii (et309537/21l196av) and experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) immediately post-procedure.It was reported that the patient is hospitalized.The treating physician commented that there is a high possibility that perforations were made with wires.Details of the procedure: a phenom 21 microcatheter (medtronic) was delivered to the target position.The 5mm x 22mm embotrap iii was then deployed at the distal m1 segment of the mca.Three passes were performed with the device.Then, a 5mm x 37mm embotrap iii was then utilized.Recanalization was achieved, and the procedure was completed.After that, a sah was found.The devices were allegedly used according to the instructions for use (ifu).Additional information received indicated that the treating physician commented that ¿there is a possibility that perforations were made with wires but, it is higher possible that perforations were made with the complaint et iii than that.¿ the device was discarded therefore no further investigation can be performed.A review of the device history record (dhr) associated with lot number 21l196av presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection process that can be related to the reported event.Hemorrhage and vessel perforation are well-known extensively documented potential complication associated with endovascular mechanical thrombectomy and is listed in the embotrap instructions for use (ifu) as such.With the limited information provided, it is not possible to determine the root cause of the sah; however, patient, procedural, and pharmacological factors may have contributed with no evidence of a device malfunction or quality issue.The sah secondary to vessel perforation is considered a serious injury and the relationship of the embotrap iii to the reported event cannot be excluded.The file will be re-reviewed if additional information is received at a later date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBOTRAP III 5 MM X 22 MM
Type of Device
EMBOTRAP III REVASCULARIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
NEURAVI LTD.
block 3 ballybritt
business park
galway H91 K 5YD
EI  H91 K5YD
Manufacturer (Section G)
ADVANT MEDICAL
parkmore business park west
galway H91 P V0V
EI   H91 PV0V
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
9497898687
MDR Report Key13938311
MDR Text Key288135944
Report Number3011370111-2022-00031
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier10886704082866
UDI-Public10886704082866
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K193063
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/29/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/29/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberET309522
Device Catalogue NumberET309522
Device Lot Number21J113AV
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/11/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EMBOTRAP III 5 MM X 37 MM; PHENOM 21 MICROCATHETER (MEDTRONIC)
-
-