Unintended system movement was reported by the user for the mammomat inspiration device.The user was seated on a stool with the unit in a 90-degree position to perform a lateromedial projection.When the user was about to compress the patient's breast, the unit suddenly started to turn downwards to 180 degrees.The tube gantry pushed the operator off the stool while striking the shoulder.Following the described occurrence, the examination was successfully completed in a different projection (a 45- or 60-degree position instead of 90 degrees), and the unit rotated normally.The issue did not lead to repeated radiation exposure.There are no injuries attributed to the event as the patient was not yet compressed.No injuries to the operator were communicated either.The reported incident occurred in (b)(6).
|
Additional/corrected information: g4: 510(k) was corrected.H8: usage of device added.H6, h10:the reported event was investigated in detail.The investigation of the log files confirmed that the foot switch was pressed to compress the patient and to lift the swivel arm to a higher position.The described unintended movement could not be confirmed.According to the log files the motion of the swivel arm to its largest angulation of -117,68° (not as stated in the complaint text to 180°) was done as specified because the rotate-counter-clockwise-button was pressed.During the onsite investigation, the service technician did mechanical checks at the system to reproduce the problem but could not find any issues.The motor was preventatively exchanged during this onsite service after the event.At that point in time, it was not clear that movement had been initiated by pressing the motion buttons.Therefore, no investigation of the motor was indicated.The construction of the worm-gear of the motor is self-locking, and for safety reasons its spring-operated motor-brake is activated after the switch to rotate the swivel arm is released and, therefore, the electrically driven motion is stopped.This will prevent the swivel arm from continuing to rotate towards -180° without being electrically driven.Even during the mechanical tests performed by service technician, the described problem could not be reproduced.No malfunction could be determined at site or during investigation of the provided data.Therefore, most likely (and by expert statement) the issue occurred due to the accidental pressing of the button to rotate counterclockwise (as confirmed in the log files) during the preparation for the exposure by the operator or the patient when the compression of the breast was started.The described screeching sound can be caused from different reasons but cannot cause the described issue.In general, the brake pad is only activated during stereo- or tomo-exposures and has no influence in this case.The system is in use without a reoccurrence of the described issue.No general or systematic problem is known from the installed base.The complaint has been closed without further measures.Internal id# (b)(4).
|