During on-site checking in follow-up to the event, the draeger technician found the lower rolling diaphragm being damaged to be the root cause of the reported symptom.Based on the log analysis, it could be confirmed that during the case in question, the device alarmed for reinstall ventilator due to a too low (negative) vacuum pressure in the piston.It could be concluded that the lower diaphragm being damaged caused a leak and thus the low vacuum pressure.The vacuum pressure is traced by a pressure sensor and after falling below the limit of -80 hpa, the device alarmed reinstall ventilator as specified.Finally, it can be concluded that the device responded appropriately upon a deviation in the pneumatic system and posted a corresponding alarm.No patient consequences have occurred.The replacement of the diaphragm has already solved the problem; the device passed all consecutive tests and was returned to use without further problems reported.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
|