The patient had a pdc implanted at c4-c5 on (b)(6) 2021.It was reported that a pdc implant had migrated anteriorly, which caused patient pain and radicular symptoms, the decision to remove the implant was made on (b)(6) 2022 and the removal surgery took place on (b)(6) 2022.The patient's symptoms are believed to be due to the use of an implant height that was too tall, 6 mm high implant was used which is not the shortest implant size available.The patient's symptoms and device migration led to a determination that this was a reportable adverse event.Dhr review did not find any problems in manufacturing.Complaint history found the rate of complaints was improbable.The risk associated with this complaint is identified and the complaint rate is acceptable based on the risk assessment.Device was retrieved and shipped to exponent for evaluation.The stg recommends that the smallest device height is to be used compared to adjacent healthy discs.The information suggests that the smallest height was not used.The investigation determined that a use error in patient selection and implant sizing led to the device migration which caused the patient pain and radicular symptoms.This report is for 1 of 1 devices involved in this event.
|