• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX PEEK ANCH.W/OCORD; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US 4.5 HEALIX PEEK ANCH.W/OCORD; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 222205
Device Problems Contamination /Decontamination Problem (2895); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/23/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported by the customer in (b)(6) that during a reconstruction of medial patellar ligament procedure on (b)(6) 2022, it was observed that the shaft could not be removed on the 4.5 healix peek anch.W/ocord device.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that there was biological matter over the inserter on the device.Another like device was used to complete the surgery.There were no adverse consequences to the patient nor surgical delay reported.No additional information could be provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).Investigation summary: the complaint device was received and evaluated.Upon visual inspection, it was observed that, the anchor's tip was cut, the anchor is assembled on the device's inserter and is hard to pull it out.The suture was not returned.The anchor was removed from the inserter by applying force counter-clockwise.At magnification of the inserter tip, it was observed rests of biological matter over the inserter, once removed, the anchor was inserted and removed off the inserter with no restriction.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 8l36855 number, and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.According with the visual inspection result, this complaint can be confirmed.A root cause for the reported condition can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; excessive force may was applied to the anchor when tightening, therefore, the anchor got stuck on the inserter tip, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
4.5 HEALIX PEEK ANCH.W/OCORD
Type of Device
SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin blanc 38
le locle CH-24 00
SZ   CH-2400
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
8472871282
MDR Report Key14075157
MDR Text Key292508817
Report Number1221934-2022-01123
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MAI
UDI-Device Identifier10886705007530
UDI-Public10886705007530
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K150209
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/11/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number222205
Device Catalogue Number222205
Device Lot Number8L36855
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/14/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/13/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-