• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM; GROWING ROD SYSTEM - MAGNETIC ACTUATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM; GROWING ROD SYSTEM - MAGNETIC ACTUATION Back to Search Results
Model Number UNKNOWN
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Unstable (1667)
Patient Problem Metal Related Pathology (4530)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Information was receive that dual standard and offset rods were implanted at t5-l4 with claw construct at the proximal foundation (t5-t6) and pedicle screws at the distal foundation (l3-l4).Postoperatively the patient was given a corset with shoulder straps for 3 months before monthly outpatient distractions were performed.Despite the finding of proximal junctional kyphosis (pjk) 5 months after the surgery, early distractions were smooth and successful.At the 11th distraction, one and a half years after rod implantation, rod slippage occurred in both rods and no lengthening was observed.Targeted 2mm distraction was continued at the next two clinics despite continuous rod slippage and failed lengthening.The difficulties were initially contributed to the uncooperative patient who became irritable during distraction sessions.Subsequently, a distraction session under sedation was performed to eliminate the soft tissue resistance contributed by muscle contraction.Despite successful distraction on the left rod, continuous slippage was still observed on the right rod.As further lengthening was unsuccessful, rod exchange was performed with proximal extension to t3-t4 to control the proximal junctional kyphosis.Intraoperatively metallosis was observed around the screw-rod junction.After rod exchange, smooth distractions were again observed for both rods.The patient is now two years after the rod exchange with monthly successful lengthenings.Report 2 of 2.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Third party analysis: retrospective examination of the radiographs acquired prior to the sedation procedure revealed rod angulation between the actuator and the extendable portion of the rod.The extracted mcgrs were studied in a mechanical laboratory.Externally there was no rod fracture but there were many wearing marks at the junction between the extended portion of the rod and the actuator.Rod angulation was also observed by placing the rod next to a straight bench edge.After the extended portion and the actuator were dissected, it was revealed that the threads of the internal screw providing the distraction were no longer in-line with such deformation and thus the screw refused to rotate with external magnetic force due to the increased resistance.After the screw was dislodged and re-inserted along the correct threads, the screw was able to rotate manually under external force and the distraction resumed.Literature - title of article: the crooked rod sign - a new radiological sign to detect deformed threads in the distraction mechanism of magnetically controlled growing rods and a mode of distraction failure - authors: jason pui yin cheung, teng zhang, cora bow, kenny kwan, kam yin sze, kenneth man chee cheung.Publication date: 2019.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAGEC SPINAL BRACING AND DISTRACTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
GROWING ROD SYSTEM - MAGNETIC ACTUATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS
101 enterprise #100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer (Section G)
NUVASIVE SPECIALIZED ORTHOPEDICS
101 enterprise #100
aliso viejo CA 92656
Manufacturer Contact
geoff gannon
101 enterprise #100
aliso viejo, CA 92656
8583448112
MDR Report Key14116144
MDR Text Key293539121
Report Number3006179046-2022-00171
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PGN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeHK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/14/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-