• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 HUBER PLUS 20G X 1" NEEDLELESS Y SITE; SET, ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 HUBER PLUS 20G X 1" NEEDLELESS Y SITE; SET, ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Patient Problem Infiltration into Tissue (1931)
Event Date 03/16/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported the huber plus needle safety set 20g x 1.0 in with needless y-site bent upon insertion.Patient was accessed on (b)(6) 2022, this issue occurred on (b)(6) 2022 date of occurrence:(b)(6) 2022 was there any patient harm reported? if yes, please describe the harm, how it was treated and the outcome.Yes ¿ patient had iv fluid infiltrate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
 
Event Description
It was reported the huber plus needle safety set 20g x 1.0 in with needless y-site bent upon insertion.Patient was accessed on (b)(6) 2022, this issue occurred on (b)(6) 2022.Date of occurrence: on (b)(6) 2022.Was there any patient harm reported? if yes, please describe the harm, how it was treated and the outcome.Yes, patient had iv fluid infiltrate.Add info rcvd: was successful port access confirmed via blood aspiration or x-ray? when the port was accessed on (b)(6), there was blood aspiration confirming placement did the iv infiltrate occur on (b)(6) 2022? yes.What was being infused when the infiltration occurred? d5 0.45ns.Did the infiltration require medical treatment? if yes, please describe the treatment and outcome.Warm compress was the bend in the needle discovered during port de-access or at another time during use? discovered with port de-access after discovery of infiltration were there any difficulties encountered during port access? no.Did the safety mechanism function successfully with the bend in the needle? no.Were there any signs of infusion difficulties between on (b)(6)? if yes, will you please describe? no.How was the port needle secured / dressed? yes.Was there any event that inadvertently caused pulling / tugging / bumping the needle or tubing during use? no.Will you confirm that the implanted port continues to function properly with new needle access? yes, the port was re-accessed successfully on (b)(6) for treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a bent infusion set needle was confirmed; however, the root cause was not identified.The implicated product was one 20ga x 1¿ huber plus safety infusion set and the returned product was one photograph which depicted a 20ga x 1¿ huber plus safety infusion set.The depicted region of the device included the needle housing and a portion of extension tubing.The safety mechanism was engaged.The needle shaft was bent upward and the needle tip remained outside the safety.The bend occurred near the exit site from the housing.Deformation of the needle shaft was evident in the submitted photograph; however, inspection of the photograph was insufficient to identify the cause of the bend.Consequently this complaint is confirmed as ¿cause unknown¿ at this time.Potential contributing factors include contact between the needle tip and the indwelling port base and lateral pressure placed on the needle during port access.H3 other text: evaluation findings are in section h.11.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HUBER PLUS 20G X 1" NEEDLELESS Y SITE
Type of Device
SET, ADMINISTRATION, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
kelsey erickson
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
8015950700
MDR Report Key14117870
MDR Text Key289331371
Report Number3006260740-2022-01305
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FPA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
UNK
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/15/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/30/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/27/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age20 MO
Patient Weight13 KG
-
-