• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR DRAGONFLY¿ OPTIS¿ IMAGING CATHETER; DIAGNOSTIC INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR DRAGONFLY¿ OPTIS¿ IMAGING CATHETER; DIAGNOSTIC INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number C408646
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problems Angina (1710); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 03/25/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no indication of a lot specific product quality issue.Based on the information provided, the reported difficulty advancing appears to be due to circumstances of the procedure.It is likely that challenging anatomical conditions caused resistance during advancement resulting in the reported issue.A cause for the reported dissection, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.Dissection is listed in the dragonfly optis instructions for use (ifu) as a known complication that may occur as a consequence of intravascular imaging and catheterization procedures.The unexpected medical intervention, and treatment with medications were related to procedural circumstances.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Event Description
It was reported the procedure was performed in a heavily calcified, heavily tortuous and 90% stenosed lesion in the left anterior descending artery.A dragonfly optis catheter was inserted but was unable to cross the lesion.It was then observed the catheter caused a dissection in the left circumflex.Therefore, the catheter was removed and a stent was implanted to treat the dissection.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no indication of a lot specific product quality issue.Based on the information provided, the reported difficulty advancing appears to be due to circumstances of the procedure.It is likely that challenging anatomical conditions caused resistance during advancement resulting in the reported issue.A cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The unexpected medical intervention were related to procedural circumstances.The reported patient effects of vascular dissection and angina are listed in the instructions for use as known complications that may occur as a consequence of intravascular imaging and catheterization procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.Attachment: article, "ostial circumflex dissection caused by off-track oct catheter"a2, age g2, added report source "literature".H6, medical device problem code: code 2524 was changed to 2920; clinical codes 1710 and 1914 added.
 
Event Description
Subsequent to the previously filed report, additional information was received that the physician had written a case study article about this patient titled, "ostial circumflex dissection caused by off-track oct catheter".The guide catheter was repositioned to have a more coaxial engagement and the dragonfly optis catheter was successfully delivered to the distal lad, but a dissection was noted in the lcx.During oct (optical coherence tomography) evaluation, the patient was experiencing chest pain with unstable hemodynamics.Careful contrast injection revealed the above-mentioned dissection at the ostial-proximal part of lcx with compromised antegrade flow.Double-kissing culotte stenting at the left main bifurcation was performed as treatment.The patient was then stabilized.The final angiogram and 3-dimensional oct showed good results.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DRAGONFLY¿ OPTIS¿ IMAGING CATHETER
Type of Device
DIAGNOSTIC INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT MEDICAL REG#3009600098
4 robbins rd
westford MA 01886
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key14142330
MDR Text Key289512341
Report Number2024168-2022-04192
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier00183739000654
UDI-Public00183739000654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeID
PMA/PMN Number
K141769 
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/19/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/08/2023
Device Model NumberC408646
Device Catalogue NumberC408646
Device Lot Number8077970
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/09/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age53 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient RaceAsian
-
-