BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE MRI DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number L311 |
Device Problems
Premature Discharge of Battery (1057); Failure to Capture (1081); Pacing Problem (1439); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535); Under-Sensing (1661); Use of Device Problem (1670); Inappropriate or Unexpected Reset (2959); Interrogation Problem (4017)
|
Patient Problems
Dyspnea (1816); Pain (1994); Burning Sensation (2146)
|
Event Date 03/30/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient presented to the clinic with complaint of a burning sensation, pain over the pacemaker and shortness of breath (sob).The physician noted that the skin appeared normal, however, was tender to the touch.The patient noted having lithotripsy within the past month.Review of a surface electrogram (egm) noted no pacing spikes or paced complexes.An attempt was made to interrogate the device with three different programmers, however, an interrogation was unsuccessful.Additionally, a magnet response was unable to be obtained.The patient presented to the hospital for a device replacement procedure three weeks later.Prior to the procedure, the device was able to be interrogated with a programmer and was found to have reverted to safety mode.The device was explanted and replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.At this time, the product has not been returned.If the product is returned, analysis will be performed and this report would be updated at that time.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient presented to the clinic with complaint of a burning sensation, pain over the pacemaker and shortness of breath (sob).The physician noted that the skin appeared normal, however, was tender to the touch.The patient noted having lithotripsy within the past month.Review of a surface electrogram (egm) noted no pacing spikes or paced complexes.An attempt was made to interrogate the device with three different programmers, however, an interrogation was unsuccessful.Additionally, a magnet response was unable to be obtained.The patient presented to the hospital for a device replacement procedure three weeks later.Prior to the procedure, the device was able to be interrogated with a programmer and was found to have reverted to safety mode.The device was explanted and replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.At this time, the product has not been returned.If the product is returned, analysis will be performed and this report would be updated at that time.It was reported that an error message was observed during the pre-procedure interrogation, the device exhibited pacing inhibition, undersensing, there was concern of loss of capture (loc) and the device battery was also suspected to have depleted prematurely.The product has been received for analysis.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our quality assurance laboratory.The device had no telemetry and could not be interrogated.The device case was removed to facilitate inspection of the internal components and further testing.The battery was noted to be slightly swollen; it was removed from the device and replaced with an external power source.The current drain was measured and found to be normal.Detailed analysis of the battery identified an internal short, which was caused by a tear in the cathode insulating tube.The short caused an increase in power consumption, which resulted in the slightly swollen battery, and the clinically-observed reversion to safety mode operation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient presented to the clinic with complaint of a burning sensation, pain over the pacemaker and shortness of breath (sob).The physician noted that the skin appeared normal, however, was tender to the touch.The patient noted having lithotripsy within the past month.Review of a surface electrogram (egm) noted no pacing spikes or paced complexes.An attempt was made to interrogate the device with three different programmers, however, an interrogation was unsuccessful.Additionally, a magnet response was unable to be obtained.The patient presented to the hospital for a device replacement procedure three weeks later.Prior to the procedure, the device was able to be interrogated with a programmer and was found to have reverted to safety mode.The device was explanted and replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.At this time, the product has not been returned.If the product is returned, analysis will be performed and this report would be updated at that time.It was reported that an error message was observed during the pre-procedure interrogation, the device exhibited pacing inhibition, undersensing, there was concern of loss of capture (loc) and the device battery was also suspected to have depleted prematurely.The product has been received for analysis.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|