• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON P/A CR BEADED #4R; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON P/A CR BEADED #4R; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Model Number 5517-F-402
Device Problems Malposition of Device (2616); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 04/01/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As reported: "revision of right femur." a femoral component and insert were revised.Update (b)(6) 2022: the revised that was on (b)(6) 2022.The first surgery was done about month and half before.Femoral component was removed due to its mal-placement.Pt complaining of pain.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.The following devices were also listed in this report: x3 triathlon cs ins size 4 9mm; cat # 5531g409; lot # unknown.It cannot be determined which, if any of these devices may have caused or contributed to the patient's experience.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Implant date updated.Reported event: an event regarding malposition involving a triathlon femoral component was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "an ap and lateral view of a right knee is provided.It appears to be a cementless cruciate retaining triathlon tritanium total knee arthroplasty.From the x-rays provided i do not see any gross ¿malplacement.¿ lateral view shows the femoral component obliquely.[¿] as mentioned, it is difficult to implicate a device or procedure based on the facts, i have been given but theoretically if the revision was done for "malplacement," approximately a month and a half after the index surgery, then unless there was trauma, the cause would be iatrogenic with improper or inaccurate assessment of bony landmarks, alignment, and position.The implants themselves cannot be implicated.As for the root cause of "malplacement," it is almost always operative technique in nature with inaccurate assessment of bony landmarks, position, and alignment.No patient related or implant factors are implicated." -product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.-complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to malposition of the femoral component.A review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "an ap and lateral view of a right knee is provided.It appears to be a cementless cruciate retaining triathlon tritanium total knee arthroplasty.From the x-rays provided i do not see any gross ¿malplacement.¿ lateral view shows the femoral component obliquely.[¿] as mentioned, it is difficult to implicate a device or procedure based on the facts, i have been given but theoretically if the revision was done for "malplacement," approximately a month and a half after the index surgery, then unless there was trauma, the cause would be iatrogenic with improper or inaccurate assessment of bony landmarks, alignment, and position.The implants themselves cannot be implicated.As for the root cause of "malplacement," it is almost always operative technique in nature with inaccurate assessment of bony landmarks, position, and alignment.No patient related or implant factors are implicated." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
As reported: "revision of right femur." a femoral component and insert were revised.Update 4/20/2022: the revised that was (b)(6) 2022.The first surgery was done about month and half before.Femoral component was removed due to its mal-placement.Pt complaining of pain.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIATHLON P/A CR BEADED #4R
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
marisol santiago
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key14237692
MDR Text Key290289480
Report Number0002249697-2022-00629
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327040944
UDI-Public07613327040944
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K141056
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number5517-F-402
Device Catalogue Number5517F402
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-