• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) CUP (UNKN TYPE); PROSTHESIS,HIP,HEMI-,TRUNNIONBEARING,FEMORAL,METAL/POLYACETAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) CUP (UNKN TYPE); PROSTHESIS,HIP,HEMI-,TRUNNIONBEARING,FEMORAL,METAL/POLYACETAL Back to Search Results
Device Problems Biocompatibility (2886); Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth (4002)
Patient Problems Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 03/26/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that on literature review "can hip resurfacing be safely revised with short-stem total hip arthroplasty? a case series of six patients," 1 patient operated in 2007 with bhr presented pain, the clinical examination showed a hip rotation stiffness and a hip extension deficit of 10.The imaging revealed a loose prosthesis with an acetabular bone defect and metallosis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Smith & nephew is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 c.F.R.Part 803.This report may be based upon information which smith & nephew has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, smith & nephew, or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, smith & nephew or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: it was reported that on literature review "can hip resurfacing be safely revised with short-stem total hip arthroplasty? a case series of six patients", one patient operated in 2007 with bhr presented pain, the clinical examination showed a hip rotation stiffness and a hip extension deficit of 10.The imaging revealed a loose prosthesis with an acetabular bone defect and metallosis.A revision using competitor's device was performed to treat the adverse event.At last study follow up, the patient's outcome was excellent.The devices, used in treatment, were not available for analysis.As no device part and batch numbers were provided for investigation, a complaint history review, manufacturing record review, device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, prior applicable escalation actions were identified and confirmed to reduce associated risks as far as possible.No further escalation actions are required.A risk management review was performed for the acetabular cup and femoral head.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.Without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images are required.The root cause and/or patient outcome beyond that which was documented in the article could not be confirmed nor concluded; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.Should clinical documentation become available in the future, a thorough medical assessment may be rendered at that time.Based on the available information we can confirm the reported complaint, however without further information our investigation remains inconclusive and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement.If the products or additional information become available in the future, this case will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKN BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) CUP (UNKN TYPE)
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS,HIP,HEMI-,TRUNNIONBEARING,FEMORAL,METAL/POLYACETAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key14318105
MDR Text Key292485189
Report Number3005975929-2022-00187
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-