It was reported that the procedure was to treat a mildly tortuous, mildly calcified proximal left anterior descending artery that is 90% stenosed.The lesion was pre-dilated with a 3.0x12mm non-abbott balloon.A 3.5x18mm xience skypoint stent delivery system (sds) was attempted to be advanced; however, it was difficult to advance thru the distal tip of the guide catheter.An additional attempt was made to keep advancing, but was unsuccessful.The sds was removed; however, resistance was noted and the stent became dislodged.A 1.5mm unspecified balloon was used to attempt to move the stent into the guide catheter with the balloon inflated but failed.Additionally, the stent was attempted to be removed into a protective sheath via snare, but was unsuccessful.A cut down was performed at the femoral artery to remove the stent.A non-abbott stent was then used to successfully complete the procedure.There was no adverse patient sequela; however, a clinically significant delay was reported.No additional information was provided.
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar incidents from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported difficulties; however, the delay to treatment/ therapy and subsequent treatments appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.Additionally, the cause of the reported removal of foreign body was due to the dislodged stent in the anatomy.Factors that could contribute to a difficult to advance include, but are not limited to, inner diameter of guide wire lumen, outer diameter of the guide wire, patient¿s anatomical morphology, damage to the guide wire, damage to the catheter, and/or accumulation of procedural contaminants in the guide wire lumen.Factors that could contribute to a dislodged stent include, but not limited to, improper or inadequate crimping at the time of manufacture, forced sheath removal, handling of the stent during preparation, interaction with challenging anatomy, and/or interaction with accessory devices.Factors that could contribute to a difficult to remove include, but are not limited to, damage to the balloon, stent wall apposition, interaction with challenging anatomy, and/or interaction with accessory devices.In this case, it is possible that the stent delivery system (sds) interacted with the mildly calcified, mildly tortuous, and 90% stenosed lesion and/or guide catheter during advancement, resulting in the reported difficult to advance.Further interaction with the challenging anatomy and/or guide catheter during removal, as resistance was noted, possibly resulted in the reported difficult to remove and subsequent dislodged stent; however, this cannot be confirmed.Additionally, the stent was attempted to be removed into a protective sheath via snare but was unsuccessful.A cut down was performed at the femoral artery to remove the stent.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|