On (b)(6) 2022, a patient (pt) in (b)(6) called to report tearing, redness, soreness, dryness, headache and ¿could not see from up-close¿ in both eyes on (b)(6) 2022 after 2 hours of wearing acuvue® oasys brand contact lenses (cls).The pt is a first-time wearer of the lenses and was not trial fit by an eye care professional (ecp).The pt reported daily cl wear with a monthly replacement schedule and used renu multi-purpose solution.On (b)(6) 2022, the pt provided additional information by email.The pt went to a hospital today and was advised that ¿i have uveitis, because of a foreign body that caused an eye trauma.¿ it is unknown which was the affected eye.Prescription dated (b)(6) 2022: topical use os tropicamide 1%, 1 drop every 8 hours; prednisolone 1%, 1 drop every 2 hours for 5 days, then 1 drop every 4 hours for 5 days, then 1 drop every 8 hours for 5 days, then 1 drop every 12 hours for 5 days, then 1 drop every 24 hours for 5 days, then stop.On (b)(6) 2022, the pt provided additional information by email.The pt reported the uveitis is only in the left eye (os).The pt didn¿t have the diagnosis in writing from the treating ecp.There is no return follow-up visit scheduled with the ecp.On (b)(6) 2022, the pt provided additional information.The pt only had symptoms in the os; the od was asymptomatic.The pt reported prior to the insertion of the os cl, the eye was fine.On insertion of the suspect os cl, the os felt ¿strange,¿ but the pt continued to wear the os cl for a ¿few hours.¿ when the pt tried to remove the os cl, the pt experienced difficulty and reported the cl ¿was stuck to the eye.¿ on removal of the cl, the os was red and painful with blurry vision.By evening, the pt felt pain around the entire eye, a sharp pain in the eye along with photophobia.The pt went to the ophthalmic er and was diagnosed with uveitis due to cl wear.The pt reported that the ecp referred to the ¿cl as a foreign body.¿ the pt reported the os is ok now and no longer experiences any redness, pain, or photophobia.The pt is currently using the medication as prescribed.The pt was not advised to return to the ecp for a follow-up visit and doesn¿t have a scheduled visit with the primary ecp.The pt advised if able, the pt will return to the hospital and request the diagnosis in writing.Multiple calls were placed to the pt¿s treating facility to verify the diagnosis and treatment, but nothing additional was received.No additional medical information was provided.A lot history review was performed and revealed the following: the batch records did not show any abnormalities in monomer and solution testing.All parameters tested were within specification.All sterilization requirements were successfully completed.Lot number l0042j7 was produced under normal conditions.The os suspect cl was requested for return for evaluation, but it has not yet been received.If any further relevant information is received, a supplemental report will be filed.
|