As reported, to treat a postpartum hemorrhage after a cesarean section, two bakri tamponade balloon catheters leaked.The first balloon was inflated with 100 milliliters of saline and leaked from the interface of the drainage catheter.The device was immediately removed and replaced with new device from the same lot.Upon inflating to 150 milliliters with saline, the second balloon leaked in the same location.This device was replaced with a third device and hemostasis was achieved.800 milliliters of blood was lost prior to placement of the two devices and 150 milliliters was lost after.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects.
|
Event summary: as reported, to treat a postpartum hemorrhage after a cesarean section, two bakri tamponade balloon catheters leaked.The first balloon was inflated with 100 milliliters of saline and leaked from the interface of the drainage catheter.The device was immediately removed and replaced with new device from the same lot.Upon inflating to 150 milliliters with saline, the second balloon leaked in the same location.This device was replaced with a third device and hemostasis was achieved.800 milliliters of blood was lost prior to placement of the two devices and 150 milliliters was lost after.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects.Investigation ¿ evaluation.A visual inspection and functional testing of the returned device was conducted.A document-based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record (dhr), the instructions for use, and quality control data.The complaint devices were returned in opened packaging for evaluation.Both balloons were function tested.One balloon did not leak during testing, while the other leaked at the drainage connection.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other related complaints from the lot have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied: "upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." he most probable cause of the reported event could not be determined from the available information.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook medical will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|