• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 201D
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problem Ischemia Stroke (4418)
Event Date 03/10/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Lot ¿ the lot number was not reported.Initial reporter: the customer contact information, including name, occupation, phone, fax, and e-mail address, was not reported.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported via post-market studies that on (b)(6) 2022 an (b)(6) patient with no history of brain or neurologic surgery, underwent coil embolization using a pulserider t, 3mm, 8mm arch (product code: 201d) to treat an unruptured aneurysm in the right middle cerebral artery (mca).The pulserider was successfully placed where one wing was deployed in the cerebral aneurysm.The concomitant device used was an exselsior sl10 microcatheter.It is unknown if a continuous flush was done.On (b)(6) 2022 the patient experienced a cerebral infarction on the same side as the target cerebral aneurysm.The stroke occurred in the perfusion area of the implanted vessel.No medical treatment was given.Failure to maintain the coil mass was due to the reported adverse event.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient recovered, but there was an unspecified sequela.The patient¿s nihss score was 8 points in total.The physician assessed the event as serious due to unspecified sequela.A causal relationship with the device can be denied.A causal relationship to the procedure cannot be denied.Additional information was received on (b)(6) 2022 indicated that the patient¿s baseline neurological status was mrs score= 2.On (b)(6) 2022 and the nihss score= 0.On (b)(6) 2022.The target aneurysm had the following characteristics: neck size was 4.7, parent artery diameter was 3.1, height was 6.3, the width was 9.2, and the neck to dome ratio was 1.6.The symptom associated with the cerebral infarction was an nihss score of 5a= 4, 6a= 3 and the total score was 8.The physician suspected the cause that contributed to the cerebral infarction was the procedure.It¿s unknown if the cerebral infarction required prolongation of the existing hospitalization.The current status of the patient including the date of hospital discharge is also unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: it was reported via post-market studies that on (b)(6) 2022 an 87-year-old patient with no history of brain or neurologic surgery, underwent coil embolization using a pulserider t, 3mm, 8mm arch (product code: 201d) to treat an unruptured aneurysm in the right middle cerebral artery (mca).The pulserider was successfully placed where one wing was deployed in the cerebral aneurysm.The concomitant device used was an exselsior sl10 microcatheter.It is unknown if a continuous flush was done.On (b)(6) 2022 the patient experienced a cerebral infarction on the same side as the target cerebral aneurysm.The stroke occurred in the perfusion area of the implanted vessel.No medical treatment was given.Failure to maintain the coil mass was due to the reported adverse event.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient recovered, but there was an unspecified sequela.The patient¿s nihss score was 8 points in total.The physician assessed the event as serious due to unspecified sequela.A causal relationship with the device can be denied.A causal relationship to the procedure cannot be denied.Additional information was received on 19-may-2022 indicating that the patient¿s baseline neurological status was mrs score= 2 on (b)(6) 2022 and the nihss score= 0 on (b)(6) 2022.The target aneurysm had the following characteristics: neck size was 4.7, parent artery diameter was 3.1, height was 6.3, the width was 9.2, and the neck to dome ratio was 1.6.The symptom associated with the cerebral infarction was an nihss score of 5a= 4, 6a= 3 and the total score was 8.The physician suspected the cause that contributed to the cerebral infarction was the procedure.It¿s unknown if the cerebral infarction required prolongation of the existing hospitalization.The current status of the patient including the date of hospital discharge is also unknown.The device remains implanted; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.The lot number is not known; therefore, a device history record review cannot be completed.Infarction and neurological sequelae are known potential complications associated with the use of the pulserider anrd and are listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as such.If the anrd does not hold the embolic coils within the aneurysm sack, there could be thrombosis formation, which could lead to cerebral ischemia.With the amount of information, it is not possible to draw a clinical conclusion between the device and the reported events.However, there are clinical and procedural factors including aneurysm/vessel characteristics, device selection, device manipulation, device interaction, and operator technique that may have contributed to the event rather than the design or manufacture of the device.Furthermore, the relationship of the pulserider anrd to the reported event cannot be excluded.Thus, the event is considered serious and mdr reportable.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the events were related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
michelleann garcia
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
646591-798
MDR Report Key14496344
MDR Text Key292608564
Report Number3008114965-2022-00371
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
H160002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/25/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number201D
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age87 YR
-
-