• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ STAPHSR; SEE H.10

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ STAPHSR; SEE H.10 Back to Search Results
Model Number 443419
Device Problem False Negative Result (1225)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/21/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Common device name: system, nucleic acid amplification test, dna, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus, direct specimen.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported when using the bd max¿ staphsr assay on the bd max¿ instrument a false negative result was produced.Confirmatory testing was performed.There was no report of adverse patient impact or results being reported to clinicians.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "it was reported by the customer that false negative for mrsa result on bd max.Patient result positive for sa but negative for mrsa.Customer alleged false negative for mrsa result on bd max.Patient result positive for sa but negative for mrsa.Sample reran the same.Patient positive for mrsa through different methodology.".
 
Event Description
It was reported when using the bd max¿ staphsr assay on the bd max¿ instrument a false negative result was produced.Confirmatory testing was performed.There was no report of adverse patient impact or results being reported to clinicians.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "it was reported by the customer that false negative for mrsa result on bd max.Patient result positive for sa but negative for mrsa.Customer alleged false negative for mrsa result on bd max.Patient result positive for sa but negative for mrsa.Sample reran the same.Patient positive for mrsa through different methodology.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6.Investigation: the complaint investigation for discrepant results when using the kit bd max¿ staphsr (ref 443419) lot 1279320 was performed by the review of the manufacturing records, retain material testing and verification of complaints history.Review of the manufacturing records of bd max staphsr indicated that the lot was manufactured according to specifications and met performance requirements.The retain material of bd max staphsr from lot 1279320 was tested and the results met the specifications.Customer reported a discrepant result obtained on a patient sample.The sample gave a sa positive mrsa negative result with the bd max¿ staphsr assay but gave a mrsa positive result with two other methods (id/ast and pbp 2a testing).Two run files (#6391 from instrument ct0591 and #8821 from instrument ct0841) were received for investigation.Manual curves adjudication was performed and showed that, for both runs, there was no amplification of the mrsa target (in the fam channel) but true amplification of the sa target (in the vic channel) as well as true amplification of the meca gene target (in the rox channel) was observed for the customer sample.These results suggest that the sample corresponds to a strain not detected by the bd max¿ staphsr assay.As mentioned in the package insert p0207, the bd max¿ staphsr assay is designed to detect mrej genotypes i, ii, iii, iv, v, vi, vii, ix, xiii, xiv, and xxi which represent most of meca and mecc harboring mrsa strains (belonging to different sccmec/mrej types) accounting for more than 98% of worldwide strains tested by bd to date.The investigation shows that the customer strain may correspond to a mrej type undetected by the bd max¿ staphsr assay.However, without analysis of the customer strain, bd was unable to confirm.No reagents issue is suspected.There is no indication of a reagent issue based on the analysis of the complaints received for discrepant results on the kit bd max staphsr reagent lot 1279320.The root cause was not identified.However, mrej type strain not detected by the bd max staphsr assay can explain the discrepant customer results.Bd acknowledge the customer issue but cannot confirm the complaint based on the investigation that was performed.Bd did not initiate a corrective and preventive action (capa).Bd quality will continue to monitor for trends.H3 other text : see h.10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ STAPHSR
Type of Device
SEE H.10
Manufacturer (Section D)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer (Section G)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key14519587
MDR Text Key300705079
Report Number3007420875-2022-00027
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NQX
UDI-Device Identifier00382904434199
UDI-Public00382904434199
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K132822
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/26/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date01/16/2023
Device Model Number443419
Device Catalogue Number443419
Device Lot Number1279320
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/09/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-