• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MEDTRONIC SURGICAL ANNULOPLASTY PRODUCTS; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION MEDTRONIC SURGICAL ANNULOPLASTY PRODUCTS; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number MDT-ANNULOPLASTY
Device Problem Degraded (1153)
Patient Problems Mitral Valve Stenosis (1965); Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451)
Event Date 01/12/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Citation: simonato m.; et al.Transcatheter mitral valve replacement after surgical repair or replacement: comprehensive mid-term evaluation of valve-in-valve and valve-in-ring implantation from the vivid registry.Circulation, 2021 jan 12;143(2):104-116.Doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.049088.Pmid: 32975133.Epub 2020 sep 25 earliest date of publication used for date of event.Medtronic products referenced: duran ancore band (pma# k960356, product code: krh); cg future band (# k052860, krh); profile 3d ring (# k073324, krh); hancock surgical tissue valve (# p870078, dye); mosaic surgical tissue valve (# p990064, dye).Earliest approved product used for product code and pma#.No unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information via literature regarding the survival benefit of valve-in-valve (viv)/valve-in-ring (vir) mitral valve replacement in patients with recurrent mitral valve failures.All data were collected from an international clinical registry for cases performed between march 2006 and march 2020.The study population included 1079 patients who were predominantly female with amean age of 74 years and mean weight of 70 kg.Among all patients who required vir mitral valve replacement, 13.3% were previously implanted with medtronic mitral rings/bands including duran ancore, cg future and profile 3d models (unique device identifier numbers not provided).Among all patients who required viv mitral valve replacement, 30.1% were previously implanted with medtronic surgical tissue bioprosthetic valves including hancock and mosaic models (unique device identifier numbers not provided).The majority of transcatheter mitral valve replacements (tmvr) were conducted using a non-medtronic manufacturer¿s product, however other manufacturers and models were not described.Among all patients, adverse events included: mild-severe mitral regurgitation and mitral stenosis related to ring/valve structural f ailure.Based on the available information medtronic product was directly associated with the adverse events.No additional adverse patient effects or product performance issues were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDTRONIC SURGICAL ANNULOPLASTY PRODUCTS
Type of Device
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14538441
MDR Text Key293849617
Report Number2025587-2022-01505
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberMDT-ANNULOPLASTY
Device Catalogue NumberMDT-ANNULOPLASTY
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/02/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNKNOWN IPG
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age74 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight70 KG
-
-