• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA APOLLO; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8606500
Device Problems Gas Output Problem (1266); Failure to Deliver (2338); Protective Measures Problem (3015)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/18/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported during a case the unit alarmed for a ventilator failure.There was no injury reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation was just started.The result will be forwarded in a follow up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The ventilator failure described by the user could be reconstructed by means of the logfile analysis.No indications for a device malfunction leading to the vent fail were found.Root cause for the reported symptom was an overpressure at the patient end of the circuit leading to a pressure peak.Most likely, the patient was coughing against the ventilator explaining the pressure peak.To prevent from damages, the system is designed to shut down automatic ventilation and to alert the user to this condition by means of a corresponding alarm.Manual ventilation and the monitoring functions remain available to the full extent.During on-site checking in follow-up to the event, problems with the ventilator motor were found by the dräger technician and the motor was replaced consequently.Based on earlier complaint investigations, it could be stated that the determined worn motor assembly was caused by wear-and-tear related abrasion of the collector disc resulting in development of positions where the motor does not provide mechanic power due to contact interrupts to the carbon brushes; speed fluctuations will be the consequence.These speed fluctuations may result in a deviation between intended and expected piston position.This will be detected during service, as reported in the particular case, or during pre-use check.In the particular case however, the pressure peak led to the reported ventilator failure.Dräger finally concludes that the device responded as specified upon the detected pressure peak situation ¿ likely caused by the patient coughing or breathing against the ventilator ¿ with an autonomous shutdown while changing mode to man/spont (safety mode) accompanied by an audible and visible "ventilator fail" alarm.After replacement of the motor, the device was tested and returned to use with no further problems reported.The number of similar cases, related to the same root cause, is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
 
Event Description
It was reported during a case the unit alarmed for a ventilator failure.There was no injury reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
APOLLO
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
MDR Report Key14571883
MDR Text Key297361003
Report Number9611500-2022-00132
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K042607
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/02/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8606500
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/31/2008
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-