• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS 9180 ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS 9180 ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER Back to Search Results
Model Number ISE 9180
Device Problem Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/11/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The initial reporter stated they received discrepant results for four patient samples tested with electrode, ise lithium on a 9180 electrolyte analyzer.The samples were initially tested on (b)(6) 2022 and the initial lithium values were reported outside of the laboratory and were questioned by the doctor.The customer replaced the system reagent that day and ran controls.On (b)(6) 2022, the samples were repeated and the customer stated that all controls recovered within range.The first sample initially resulted in a lithium value of 0.16 mmol/l and repeated as 0.6 mmol/l.The second sample initially resulted in a lithium value of 0.11 mmol/l and repeated as 0.49 mmol/l.The third sample initially resulted in a lithium value of < 0.1 mmol/l and repeated as 0.24 mmol/l.The fourth sample initially resulted in a lithium value of < 0.1 mmol/l and repeated as 0.38 mmol/l.The lot number of the lithium electrode was 21520847, with an expiration date of 09-sep-2022.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The field service engineer found bubbles in the reference electrode tubing.The lithium electrode was changed and the bubbles in the reference electrode were removed by priming the system.The samples were repeated on (b)(6) 2022 after this action.The first sample repeated with a lithium value of 0.67 mmol/l.The second sample repeated with a lithium value of 0.51 mmol/l.The third sample was repeated twice, with lithium values of 0.36 mmol/l and 0.40 mmol/l.The fourth sample repeated with a lithium value of 0.47 mmol/l.Precision studies were also performed with the affected samples, with lithium results as follows: sample 1: 0.71 mmol/l, 0.71 mmol/l, 0.71 mmol/l, 0.68 mmol/l, 0.70 mmol/l, 0.68 mmol/l.Sample 2: 0.68 mmol/l, 0.62 mmol/l, 0.61 mmol/l, 0.70 mmol/l, 0.67 mmol/l, 0.68 mmol/l, 0.69 mmol/l, 0.67 mmol/l, 0.67 mmol/l, 0.67 mmol/l.Sample 3: 0.45 mmol/l, 0.41 mmol/l, 0.43 mmol/l.Sample 4: 0.52 mmol/l, 0.53 mmol/l, 0.54 mmol/l.On (b)(6) 2022, the engineer found a bubble inside the reference electrode and suspected there was leakage from the reference electrode connector.The full facility name was provided as "(b)(6)".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Three levels of control were within range on (b)(6) 2022.The first level of control was run at a later time on the same day and was rejected.Calibration performed on (b)(6) 2022 was within limits.The electrodes, analyzer, and system reagent were provided for investigation.The reference electrode housing had an install before date (b)(6) 2020.If installed on this date, the electrode was valid until (b)(6) 2021 based on an in-use time of 52 weeks.Based on photographs, air bubbles were observed in the reference system tubes.In the received reference housing and tubes, the tubes and housing were disconnected.The housing and tubes showed no damage, neither at the tubes or connector.The reference electrode had an install before date of (b)(6) 2020 and was installed on (b)(6) 2021.No damage to the electrode was observed.The lithium electrode had an install before date of (b)(6) 2022 and was installed on (b)(6) 2022.With a 13 weeks in-use time, the electrode was valid until (b)(6) 2022.It was observed that the electrode had enough inner solution and no visible damage.The system reagent pack received had an expiration date of 13-jan-2024.The pack showed no leakage or damage.The reagent pack was installed on a retention instrument.Calibrations and controls were ok for the lithium parameter as well as for other parameters.15 control measurements were performed with each control level and only one measurement for the level 1 control was 30% different.Based on the specification for the lithium electrode, bias and repeatability were within specification.The discrepancies observed by the customer could not be reproduced.Despite observing bubbles in the tubes during retention testing, no leakage was observed at reference electrode housing connectors or the tubes.All measurements were within specifications except for the one outlier.The reference electrode housing, reference electrode, and lithium electrode certificates of analysis showed no irregularities at the time of production.The investigation could not identify a product problem.The cause of the event could not be determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
9180 ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER
Type of Device
ELECTROLYTE ANALYZER
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE INSTRUMENT CENTER AG TEGIMENTA
forrenstrasse
na
rotkreuz 6343
SZ   6343
Manufacturer Contact
michael leslie
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3175214343
MDR Report Key14574819
MDR Text Key293264378
Report Number1823260-2022-01586
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JFP
UDI-Device Identifier04015630031832
UDI-Public04015630031832
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMC
PMA/PMN Number
K961458
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/02/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberISE 9180
Device Catalogue Number03157334001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/29/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-