It was reported that, after a thr surgery performed on (b)(6) 2006, a revision surgery on a total hip prosthesis was performed on (b)(6) 2021 to explant the ceramic ceramic insert standard 48/36 that had been fractured for several weeks.The patient complained of pain around the right hip.A loosening of the sl-plus stem lateral 5 non-cemented was noted.Current health status of the patient is unknown.
|
H10: it was reported that, after a thr surgery performed on (b)(6) 2006, a revision surgery on a total hip prosthesis was performed on 22-sep-2021 to explant the ceramic insert standard 48/36 that had been fractured for several weeks ((b)(4)).The patient complained of pain around the right hip.A loosening of the sl-plus stem lateral 5 non-cemented was noted ((b)(4)).Current health status of the patient is unknown.The complaint device sl-plus stem lateral 5 non-cemented, used in treatment, was not returned for investigation hence the product evaluation could not be performed.A review of the batch record revealed no deviations from the standard manufacturing process.A review of the complaint history revealed no additional complaint for the batch in question.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode and severity of the reported issue.Review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.The ifu stated inadequate osseointegration among possible side effects resulting from hip arthroplasty.The medical investigation was performed.The reported pain is consistent with the loosening of the femoral stem and rupture of the ceramic insert.However, with the limited information provided the clinical root cause of the loosening of the femoral stem and rupture of the ceramic insert cannot be confirmed.It should be noted the components were implanted 15 years prior to revision.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.Based on the performed investigations, the reported failure mode could not be confirmed independently since the complaint device was not available for investigation.A relationship between the reported event and the device cannot be confirmed.The reported device met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.No probable cause can be determined.This version of the device will be monitored for similar issues.This investigation is considered closed.Should the complaint device become available, the complaint will be reassessed.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|