• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA VAPOR 2000; ANESTHESIA UNIT VAPORIZERS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA VAPOR 2000; ANESTHESIA UNIT VAPORIZERS Back to Search Results
Device Problems Restricted Flow rate (1248); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/28/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the anesthetist could not increase the dosage of sevoflurance beyond 3 vol% due to a blocked control dial at the vaporizer.As per report, the patient woke up before the surgery started.The users administered iv drugs and continued the procedure with a replacement vaporizer; no patient consequences have reportedly occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Dräger is waiting for return of the device to start evaluation.Results will be provided in a follow-up report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The owner/operator of the involved vaporizer is the baxter healthcare corporation.Despite repeated reminders were sent, the device was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Without the possibility to evaluate the concerned device, no reliable conclusion in regard to the exact root cause is possible.The device is 14 years old; service status is unknown.It is under responsibility and control of the user to inspect the product prior to each use cycle for mechanical integrity etc.And not to put it into operation when significant deviations are observed.A blocked or free-moving control dial becomes obvious during pre-use check.Furthermore, patient gas monitoring is mandatory for anesthetic procedures whereby potentially resulting dosage deviations would be detected if the device is being put into operation in this state.Post market surveillance data reasonably suggests that the design of the control dial mechanism is adequate for the typical use conditions.H3 other text: device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the anesthetist could not increase the dosage of sevoflurance beyond 3 vol% due to a blocked control dial at the vaporizer.As per report, the patient woke up before the surgery started.The users administered iv drugs and continued the procedure with a replacement vaporizer; no patient consequences have reportedly occurred.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the anesthetist could not increase the dosage of sevoflurance beyond 3 vol% due to a blocked control dial at the vaporizer.As per report, the patient woke up before the surgery started.The users administered iv drugs and continued the procedure with a replacement vaporizer; no patient consequences have reportedly occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation with more than 3 months delay.The device is 14 years old and exhibits a heavy drop damage.The sight glass cover and the sight glass itself were broken, the tank bottom cover was missing and the tank has dent marks.Furthermore, the complained aspect can be confirmed: the knob of the control dial was broken loose while the axis of the delivery unit that shall be rotated by the dial was jammed.It is under responsibility and control of the user to inspect the product prior to each use cycle for mechanical integrity etc.And not to put it into operation when significant deviations are observed.The damages of the vaporizer are multiple and more than obvious and should have prevented from putting the device into operation.Furthermore, a blocked or free-moving control dial becomes obvious during the required pre-use check.It is seen likely that the pre-use check was omitted - otherwise the operator would have recognized that the dial is not operable and should have come to the conclusion that the device can't be used.The reported event must be attributed to a chain of use errors; this is a constellation being beyond the control mechanisms a manufacturer can establish.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VAPOR 2000
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNIT VAPORIZERS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
MDR Report Key14754031
MDR Text Key294607141
Report Number9611500-2022-00152
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K971923
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/21/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/30/2007
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-