• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Model Number 74120156
Device Problem Biocompatibility (2886)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Osteolysis (2377); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Unequal Limb Length (4534)
Event Date 01/11/2019
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that, after a bhr resurfacing construct had been implanted on the patient¿s left hip on (b)(6) 2007, the patient experienced pain localized in the groin area and center of the left buttock, leg length discrepancy of approximately 5mm, elevated metal ion levels, adverse reaction to metallic debris, osteolysis of the proximal femur and retroacetabular region and pathologic intertrochanteric fracture at the tip of the resurfacing head.A revision surgery was conducted on (b)(6) 2019 to treat this adverse event.During this procedure, both the bhr acetabular cup and femoral resurfaced head were explanted and replaced with a competitor¿s thr system.The patient¿s outcome is not known.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a left hip bhr revision surgery was performed due to pain, leg length discrepancy, elevated metal ion levels, adverse reaction to metallic debris, osteolysis and pathologic intertrochanteric fracture.The devices, used in treatment, were not returned for evaluation.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the devices concerned.A review of historical complaints data was performed using the part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the acetabular cup and similar complaints have been identified for the femoral head.This failure will continue to be monitored.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, manufacturing record review, device labelling / ifu review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.Although the reported pain, elevated metal ions, pseudocapsule, dark staining and metallic staining may be consistent with the reported ¿adverse reaction to metallic debris¿ the clinical root cause of the reported events/ clinical reactions cannot confirmed.However, it should be noted the surgical technique for bhr (01/07 4567-0103) indicates, the acetabular component is to be fully impacted with 15-20° of anteversion and 40-45° inclination angle.It is unknown if the increased anteversion of the acetabular component led to accelerated wear and the reported adverse reaction to metallic debris and intertrochanteric fracture.The patient impact beyond the revision and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Based on the available information, including operatory reports, we can confirm the reported complaint, however without further information our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key14847074
MDR Text Key295059641
Report Number3005975929-2022-00411
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010502599
UDI-Public03596010502599
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P040033
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number74120156
Device Catalogue Number74120156
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Hospitalization;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-