• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN HIP IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US UNKNOWN HIP IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK HIP
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Impaired Healing (2378)
Event Date 02/25/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
"this complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: riemer k, lange j.Early periprosthetic hip joint infection managed by cementless one-stage revision - a case series.J bone jt infect.2022 feb 25;7(1):43-50.Doi: 10.5194/jbji-7-43-2022.Pmid: 35251904; pmcid: pmc8892566.Objective and methods: the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of cementless one-stage revision for early periprosthetic joint infection (pji) in elective primary total hip arthroplasty (tha) regarding risk of re-operation with exchange of implants in 18 patients between january 2012 and march 2018.Early pji is defined as confirmed infection within 6 weeks of primary tha with clinical signs of fever, erythema, wound drainage, and pain, lab results of elevated crp, leukocytosis, and positive cultures, and direct fistulation (deep infection) to the joint.All stage 1 revisions followed the coriha protocol requiring extensive biofilm debridement during revision, drape and instrumentation changes, patient re-sterilization between removal and implantation, and no use of drains or pain catheters.All patients retained their revision devices by end of follow-up.Non-patient specific results: the authors do no provide sufficient information to associate these events with one of the identified patients.3 patients with primary infectious agents s.Aureus had delayed wound healing treated with i&d.The wound was healed within 6 months.1 patient had an unspecified ppf at 1 month and again at 2 years, both requiring orif.No revision required.Patient specific results: patient 1: 63 yo female, bmi 39.7.Primary implants: competitor cup/liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: corynebacterial.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with competitor cup/liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Patient 2: 52 yo male, bmi 49.2.Primary implants: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner paired with corail stem/unknown head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 3: 78 yo female, bmi 33.4.Primary implants: competitor cup/liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: mrsa.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 4: 77 yo female, bmi 32.2.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: mixed flora.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 5: 72 yo female, bmi 27.5.Primary implants: competitor cup/liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: unspecified.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.After revision, patient had prolonged wound healing requiring a i&d, all products were retained.Patient 6: 72 yo female, bmi 30.9.Primary implants: competitor cup/liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with competitor cup/liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Patient 7: 73 yo male, bmi 28.1.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: unspecified.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 8: 44 yo female, bmi 41.2.Primary implants: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner paired with corail stem/unknown head.Intraoperative culture: mrsa.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 9: 58 yo male, bmi 32.6.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 10 76 yo male, bmi 29.3.Primary implants: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner paired with competitor stem/head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: depuy pinnacle cup/unknown liner and competitor stem/head.Patient 11: 82 yo male, bmi 27.2.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 12: 72 yo female, bmi 17.2.Primary implants: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner paired with competitor stem/head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 13: 78 yo female, bmi 21.5.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: unspecified.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 14: 76 yo female, bmi 27.7.Primary implants: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner paired with competitor stem/head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus, gas.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: depuy pinnacle cup/unknown liner and competitor stem/head.Patient 15: 63 yo female, bmi 42.0.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 16: 68 yo male, bmi 31.2.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.Patient 17: 67 yo male, bmi 44.6.Primary implants: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner paired with competitor stem/head.Intraoperative culture: p.Multocida, cons.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with primary implants: pinnacle gription cup/unknown liner paired with competitor stem/head.After revision, the patient experienced prolonged wound healing (15 months) and lle edema attributed to possible venous damage during revision combined with comorbidities of hypertension, venous insufficiency, and a.Fib.Treatment was and i & d and anticoagulant therapy.Patient 18: 81 yo female, bmi 25.4.Primary implants: pinnacle cup/unknown liner paired with depuy corail stem and depuy unknown head.Intraoperative culture: s.Aureus.Iv/oral antibiotics: yes.Revised with: pinnacle cup/unknown liner and corail stem/unknown head.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.This complaint was opened to document complaints derived through a journal article review.Follow-ups were done to try and obtain additional information from the author of the journal article.No further information was received.Device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation (mre), was not possible because the required lot code was not provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN HIP IMPLANT
Type of Device
HIP IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS INC US
700 orthopaedic drive
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. 1818910
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw IN 46581 0988
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw, IN 46581-0988
3035526892
MDR Report Key14873863
MDR Text Key295030844
Report Number1818910-2022-12034
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeDA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/30/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK HIP
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-