Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Urinary Tract Infection (2120)
|
Event Date 06/13/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event was inconclusive because no sample was returned.It is unknown whether the device had met relevant specifications.The product was used for urological care.It was unknown whether the product had caused the reported failure.No potential root cause could be concluded due to insufficient information.The device was not returned for evaluation.The lot number was unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.Unable to perform labeling review due to unknown product code.Although the product family was unknown, the foley catheter product ifus were found to be adequate based on past reviews.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient wanted to know what the tubing on their overnight bag was made from.Representative explained the tubing was pvc.Patient reluctantly admitted they were allergic to latex and were having a lot of pain from the catheter as well as multiple urinary tract infections.It was unknown what medical intervention was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event was inconclusive.No sample was returned for evaluation.A potential root cause for this failure could be ¿materials of construction are not biocompatible".The lot number was unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.The product catalog number for this device is unknown.Therefore, bd is unable to determine the associated labeling to review.Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient wanted to know what the tubing on their overnight bag was made from.Representative explained the tubing was pvc.Patient reluctantly admitted they were allergic to latex and were having a lot of pain from the catheter as well as multiple urinary tract infections.It was unknown what medical intervention was provided.Per follow-up via phone (b)(6) 2022, patient was still experiencing pain with use of the foley catheter but did not have the product information to definitely identify the product catalog or lot numbers at this time.Customer also unsure if the catheter was latex or silicone but per initial report from mis, it appeared silicone.No medical intervention was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the device was not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient wanted to know what the tubing on their overnight bag was made from.Representative explained the tubing was pvc.Patient reluctantly admitted they were allergic to latex and were having a lot of pain from the catheter as well as multiple urinary tract infections.It was unknown what medical intervention was provided.Per follow-up via phone 08july2022, patient was still experiencing pain with use of the foley catheter but did not have the product information to definitely identify the product catalog or lot numbers at this time.Customer also unsure if the catheter was latex or silicone but per initial report from mis, it appeared silicone.No medical intervention was reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|