• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 201-D
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Paralysis (1997); Visual Disturbances (2140); Vomiting (2144); Ischemia Stroke (4418); Decreased Appetite (4569)
Event Date 05/20/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: pc-(b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.The expiration date of the device is not known as the device lot number is not available / not reported.The initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address is not available.The device manufacture date is not known as the device lot number is not available / not reported.[conclusion]: the healthcare professional reported that on (b)(6) 2022 during a pulserider-assisted coil embolization procedure targeting a basilar apex aneurysm in the 72-year-old female patient.Radial access was gained and a pulserider t 3mm, 8mm arch aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) (201d / lot# unknown) was placed in the apical aneurysm via a sofia¿ 6f intermediate catheter (microvention) and a prowler select plus with continuous flush maintained.After placement of one (1) cerenovus coil and four (4) competitor coils, the pulserider anrd was detached.The procedure was completed.There were no problems with the pulserider placement or the coil embolization.The patient was reported to be in stable condition.On (b)(6) 2022 infarction findings were confirmed by computed tomography (ct).The patient did not have any symptoms at this time.On (b)(6) 2022 the patient experienced mild paralysis and was vomiting.On 16-jun-2022, the cerenovus representative was made aware of the event during a follow-up visit.The patient presented with symptoms of oculomotor nerve palsy and could not open her eyes.The patient also had no appetite.The perforator may be occluded at the marker site inside the leaflet that affects the right posterior cerebral artery.In the physician¿s opinion, the efficacy of antiplatelet agents bayaspirin and clopidogrel may also be involved and there is a possibility that the issue is related to the device.The complaint device was used in accordance with the instructions for use (ifu).It was reported that no additional treatment was provided.The event was considered serious because the patient hospitalization was prolonged due to the symptoms of the oculomotor nerve palsy.On 29-jun-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that the physician commented that the perforating branch may be occluded by the marker site inside the leaflet but accurate occlusion site was unknown.The patient is still in the hospital.The mild paralysis and vomiting have not resolved.The dosage of bayaspirin and clopidogrel were not provided.Anonymized images / angiographs are not available.Based on complaint information, the device remains implanted and is thus not available for evaluation.The device lot number was not available.The manufacturing documentation review could not be performed without the lot number.The device will not be returned for analysis and therefore, no further investigation can be performed at this time.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.Cerebral infarction is a known complication associated with coil embolization procedures and is listed in the pulserider ifu as such.There are patient, procedural, and pharmacological factors that may have contributed to the reported events.There were no alleged intraoperative complications or device malfunctions or performance issues furthermore, the relationship of the pulserider to the reported event cannot be excluded.Therefore, this event is considered serious and mdr reportable.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event Description
The healthcare professional reported that on (b)(6) 2022, during a pulserider-assisted coil embolization procedure targeting a basilar apex aneurysm in the 72-year-old female patient.Radial access was gained and a pulserider t 3mm, 8mm arch aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) (201d / lot# unknown) was placed in the apical aneurysm via a sofia¿ 6f intermediate catheter (microvention) and a prowler select plus with continuous flush maintained.After placement of one (1) cerenovus coil and four (4) competitor coils, the pulserider anrd was detached.The procedure was completed.There were no problems with the pulserider placement or the coil embolization.The patient was reported to be in stable condition.On (b)(6) 2022, infarction findings were confirmed by computed tomography (ct).The patient did not have any symptoms at this time.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient experienced mild paralysis and was vomiting.On 16-jun-2022, the cerenovus representative was made aware of the event during a follow-up visit.The patient presented with symptoms of oculomotor nerve palsy and could not open her eyes.The patient also had no appetite.The perforator may be occluded at the marker site inside the leaflet that affects the right posterior cerebral artery.In the physician¿s opinion, the efficacy of antiplatelet agents bayaspirin and clopidogrel may also be involved and there is a possibility that the issue is related to the device.The complaint device was used in accordance with the instructions for use (ifu).It was reported that no additional treatment was provided.The event was considered serious because the patient hospitalization was prolonged due to the symptoms of the oculomotor nerve palsy.On 29-jun-2022, additional information was received.The information indicated that the physician commented that the perforating branch may be occluded by the marker site inside the leaflet but accurate occlusion site was unknown.The patient is still in the hospital.The mild paralysis and vomiting have not resolved.The dosage of bayaspirin and clopidogrel were not provided.Anonymized images / angiographs are not available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on 19-jul-2022.[additional information]: on 19-jul-2022, the cerenvous sales representative provided the lot number of the pulserider aneurysm neck reconstruction device.The device lot number is 3070988602.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (3070988602) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Updated sections: b.4, d.4, g.3, g.6, h.2, h.4, h.6, and h.10.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
michelleann garcia
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
646591-798
MDR Report Key14894121
MDR Text Key295231080
Report Number3008114965-2022-00449
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
UDI-Device Identifier00859030005154
UDI-Public00859030005154
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
H160002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/01/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number201-D
Device Catalogue Number201D
Device Lot Number3070988602
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/15/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MICROCATHETER.; SOFIA¿ 6F INTERMEDIATE CATHETER (MICROVENTION).
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-