• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AESCULAP AG JANSEN BONE RONGEUR ANG190MM; BASIC INSTRUMENTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AESCULAP AG JANSEN BONE RONGEUR ANG190MM; BASIC INSTRUMENTS Back to Search Results
Model Number FO442R
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that there was an issue with fo442r - jansen bone rongeur ang190mm.According to the complaint description, the device broke during surgery.Additional information was not provided nor available.Additional patient information is not available.The adverse event / malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturing site evaluation: investigation on-going.Additional information / investigation results will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon review of the investigation, the complaint has been re-assessed and is now considered to be non-reportable; severity is now 2(5) reduced from 4(5).Investigation: visual investigation: we found that one cutting edge of the gouge has broken off.The analysis of the fracture pattern illustrated a forced fracture due to overload.No pores, inclusions or foreign bodies could be found on the point of rupture.On the surface of the instrument, we found signs of use in the form of impact, scratches and scuff marks as well as residues from reconditioning.In addition, we performed a hardness test with the results corresponding to specifications.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for the available lot number and were found to be according to our specifications valid at the time of production.Review of the complaint history revealed that there are two similar complaints filed against products from this batch number.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level (severity 2(5) x probability of occurrence 2(5)) according to din en iso 14971 is still acceptable.Explanation and rationale: considering that the instrument was not delivered in this condition, it is almost certain that a "mechanical" overload situation led to the breakage.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.Based upon the investigation results a capa is not necessary.
 
Event Description
Update: all the pieces were returned to the manufacturer; no fragments had remained in the surgical incision.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JANSEN BONE RONGEUR ANG190MM
Type of Device
BASIC INSTRUMENTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM  78501
Manufacturer (Section G)
AESCULAP AG
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
Manufacturer Contact
christian von der grün
po box 40
tuttlingen, 78501
GM   78501
MDR Report Key14986082
MDR Text Key302245783
Report Number9610612-2022-00182
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSW
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/27/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFO442R
Device Catalogue NumberFO442R
Device Lot Number4512696685
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/20/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/08/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-