The reported event could not be confirmed since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidences were provided.Medical profession reviewed the received information and noted: as far as the information shows, the tibial tray seems in order, contrary to the talar component, which has subsided and tilted.The information shows a migration (tilt) of the talar component, indicative of subsidence.New is the presence of hardware (3 screws) in the revision file, used to create a subtalar joint fusion.The preoperative sclerosis of the talus may have contributed to the talar component subsidence (avascular necrosis of a part of the talus).A pre-revision x-ray is needed however to assess this assumption.The implant looks in order, however, please note that in the prophecy revision file we are looking at a simulated image of the implant.An x-ray and eventually the retrieved implant will give more reliable information.When looking through the information received, no other irregularities can be found.A review of the device history was not possible because the lot number was not communicated.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|