Model Number AE-QAS-SP42 |
Device Problem
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
Patient Problem
Pain (1994)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that there was an issue with an unknown activl device.The information was made available via an ess surgeon survery; this was recorded from the time period (b)(6) 2020 to (b)(6) 2021.An unknown spinal implant was used during a total disc replacement (tdr).A "sensory neurological" adverse event occurred at the l4-l5 and l5-s1 level.Details were not further specified.Although requested, additional information had not been made available.The adverse event is filed under aag reference xc (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation results:
as of the date of this report the complaint product was not provided for investigation.Therefore, a thorough investigation is not possible.Batch history review:
due to the fact that a lot number was not provided, the device quality and manufacturing history records could not be checked.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures:
based upon the investigation results a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.In the event that the complaint product will be provided for investigation in the future, an update of this report will be provided unsolicited.Based on the investigation results, a capa is not necessary.
|
|
Event Description
|
Clarification: activl system typically involves 3 components; in this case, the 3 implants were unspecified.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information - b5 (clarification) investigation: as of the date of this report the complaint product was not provided for investigation.Therefore, a thorough investigation is not possible.Batch history review: due to the fact that neither an article number nor a lot number was not provided, a review of the device history records for the complained device is not possible.Explanation and rationale: the following causes are possible: - wrong system configuration selected by the user.- wrong implant size chosen by the user.- end plate formed too strong by the user.- design layout unsuitable.- inadequate patient behavior.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results, a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.In the event that the complaint product will be provided for investigation in the future, an update of this report will be provided unsolicited.Based upon the investigation results, a capa is not required.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|