Device evaluation: the device was returned for investigation.A visual inspection and functional test were performed.Visual inspection found the device presented with corroded drain fitting, cracked tank cover, faded line cord, damaged pole clamp.The customer stated problem was duplicated.The display was intermittent due to faulty pcb (printed circuit board) confirming the customer complaint.Device was not needed so it was scrapped.The cause of the reported problem could not be determined.Product is beyond a year from manufacture date and there was no indication or evidence provided in the complaint of a manufacturing defect, so a dhr (device history review) was not performed.Service history review identified this device has not been in for service in the previous year and there was no indication or evidence provided in the complaint of a service issue.Corrected data: d5: correction: operator of the device: unknown.E4: correction: customer reported to fda: no information.
|