Model Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Ossification (1428); Metal Related Pathology (4530); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Information was received that the patient underwent a revision procedure due to the contralateral side rod failing to distract and migrating into the bones of the spine.The patient was found to have heterotopic ossification, decreased lung function by 10%, a deteriorating spine and a more prominent rib hump.Per the patient's mother the patient's spine was resected in order to explant the rod and a "wedge shape of bone was resected down to the spinal cord" and was left open.Additionally, upon explant, the patient was found to have metallosis and blackened tissue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has not been returned for evaluation.The root cause is unable to be determined at this time.The reporter was unable to determine which rod corresponds to this report.The following model and lot numbers were provided: ra002-5555slr, a160531-03; ra002-5555sl, a160620-03.A review of the device history records (dhr) confirmed the device met all quality inspections and specifications prior to release.If any additional information is provided, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The unit was not returned to nuvasive for investigation.During evaluation of the provided x-ray images it was noted that the rod has been distracted just beyond the midpoint.The rod appeared to be slightly bent approximately 10 degrees.There were no additional obvious device-related abnormalities noted.From the x-ray review it does not appear that the rod has migrated into the bones of the spine as reported.There was no objective evidence provided for the reported heterotopic ossification or metallosis.The exact root cause of the reported failure could not be determined due to no device return and the reported failure was unable to be confirmed.The inspection data for the lot of the distraction rod and the housing tube was reviewed and confirmed that the parts met design specifications per the engineering drawings.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information has been provided.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|