• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CONTOUR; AGENTS, EMBOLIC, FOR TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CONTOUR; AGENTS, EMBOLIC, FOR TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fatigue (1849); Fever (1858); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Pain (1994); Constipation (3274); Decreased Appetite (4569); Swelling/ Edema (4577); Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/16/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pisco, joao m., et al."pelvic pain after uterine artery embolization: a prospective randomized study of polyvinyl alcohol particles mixed with ketoprofen versus bland polyvinyl alcohol particles." journal of vascular and interventional radiology 19.11 (2008): 1537-1542.
 
Event Description
It was reported via a journal article that patient complications occurred.Purpose: to evaluate whether pelvic pain following uterine artery embolization (uae) can be decreased by using ketoprofen mixed with polyvinyl alcohol (pva).Materials and methods: a randomized prospective study was performed in 80 patients (age range, 25 - 52 years; mean age, 41 years) undergoing uae with pva between march and august 2006.Forty patients received pva particles mixed with ketoprofen, and 40 received bland pva particles.Fifty-three patients who were asymptomatic 8 hours after embolization were discharged.Pain scores were compared during the first 8 hours after the procedure, at discharge, and the following day.The results were evaluated after 6 months.Results: eight hours after uae, 13 of the 40 patients in the group without ketoprofen (32%) reported severe or very severe pain, whereas none of the patients in the group receiving ketoprofen reported severe or very severe pain, as determined with a numeric pain score scale (p.0015).Nineteen of the 40 patients without ketoprofen (48%) were treated as inpatients, but only 10 in the ketoprofen group (25%) were treated as inpatients.The differences in the clinical outcome, as well in the uterus and fibroid sizes at discharge and at 6 months, were not statistically significant (p >.05).Conclusions: the use of pva particles mixed with ketoprofen resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pelvic pain during the first 8 hours after uae as compared to the use of pva alone.However, no significant differences in pain scores were seen after 8 hours.These findings may lead to a reduction in inpatient management for uae; however, further study of this approach is warranted.
 
Event Description
It was reported via a journal article that patient complications occurred.Purpose: to evaluate whether pelvic pain following uterine artery embolization (uae) can be decreased by using ketoprofen mixed with polyvinyl alcohol (pva).Materials and methods: a randomized prospective study was performed in 80 patients (age range, 25 - 52 years; mean age, 41 years) undergoing uae with pva between march and august 2006.Forty patients received pva particles mixed with ketoprofen, and 40 received bland pva particles.Fifty-three patients who were asymptomatic 8 hours after embolization were discharged.Pain scores were compared during the first 8 hours after the procedure, at discharge, and the following day.The results were evaluated after 6 months.Results: eight hours after uae, 13 of the 40 patients in the group without ketoprofen (32%) reported severe or very severe pain, whereas none of the patients in the group receiving ketoprofen reported severe or very severe pain, as determined with a numeric pain score scale (p.0015).Nineteen of the 40 patients without ketoprofen (48%) were treated as inpatients, but only 10 in the ketoprofen group (25%) were treated as inpatients.The differences in the clinical outcome, as well in the uterus and fibroid sizes at discharge and at 6 months, were not statistically significant (p >.05).Conclusions: the use of pva particles mixed with ketoprofen resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pelvic pain during the first 8 hours after uae as compared to the use of pva alone.However, no significant differences in pain scores were seen after 8 hours.These findings may lead to a reduction in inpatient management for uae; however, further study of this approach is warranted.It was further corrected that all patient symptoms were procedure related, and is not related to contour procedure or the contour device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrections: h6 patient codes and impact codes were updated and b5 revised as the adverse event is not related to the contour device.(b)(6)."pelvic pain after uterine artery embolization: a prospective randomized study of polyvinyl alcohol particles mixed with ketoprofen versus bland polyvinyl alcohol particles." journal of vascular and interventional radiology 19.11 (2008): 1537-1542.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONTOUR
Type of Device
AGENTS, EMBOLIC, FOR TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC LIMITED
model farm road
cork MN
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6515810888
MDR Report Key15066300
MDR Text Key296238568
Report Number2134265-2022-07840
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NAJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePO
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/16/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/20/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/21/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-