Braemar manufacturing, llc received an allegation of burns to a patient's chest area.Braemar attempted to request a device return from the customer, but the customer notified that the device was deemed "lost/stolen" and could not be retrieved or returned.The complainant was not able to provide additional information on the allegation of burns associated with the complaint.The qualitative description of "burns" could not be substantiated with further description and/or pictures to assess the claim.As a result, a skin irritation categorization could not be performed.While the complainant indicated a claim of medical consult, there is no evidence or allegation that medical or prescriptive treatment was necessitated.Sensor does not make continuous contact with patients skin.A review of the electrodes sent with the mcot package shows that the vermed electrodes were sent to the patient and have an adhesive which makes contact with the skin and is likely to be the cause of the alleged event.
|