It was reported via a journal article that necrosis occurred following embolization.Abstract: prostatic artery embolization is becoming increasingly popular in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia, particularly for patients with significant comorbidities that make them poor candidates for either general anaesthesia or surgical intervention.Penile tip necrosis as a complication following prostatic artery embolization is exceedingly rare, with only 4 cases previously reported in the world literature.It occurs as a result of the embolization material passing into and occluding collateral arterial networks such as those supplying the glans penis.This paper identifies 3 further cases of penile tip necrosis, outlines its natural history, and proposes management strategies, so that clinicians can better identify and treat this condition.Prostatic artery embolization (pae) is an emerging interventional radiological procedure performed under local anaesthesia, which provides an alternative treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph) in patients whose preference or medical comorbidities preclude either a general anaesthetic or surgical intervention[1,2].Pae has been shown to improve lower urinary tract symptoms (luts), although not with the same efficacy as a transurethral resection of prostate (turp)[3 - 5].The largest case series reported is of 630 patients, in which 35% of patients reported an immediate improvement in symptoms, 82% had clinical success at medium-term follow-up (1 to 3 years), and 76% had clinical success at long-term follow-up (3 to 6.5 years)[3].Reported complications following pae include dysuria (16.9%) and frequency (11.6%), generally lasting no more than one week, and acute urinary retention (4.6%)[6].Penile tip necrosis as a complication is reported as being exceedingly rare [3,4,6,7].This paper describes 3 cases of penile tip necrosis following pae to enable clinicians to readily identify the complication and manage patients appropriately.
|