|
Model Number LA6EBU35 |
Device Problems
Material Too Rigid or Stiff (1544); Defective Component (2292); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
Event Date 07/22/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
During a procedure, an attempt was made to use one 6f launcher guide catheter to treat a non tortuous, non calcified lesion with 0% stenosis located in the mid radial artery. there was no damage noted to the packaging.The device was removed from packaging and prepped per ifu with no issues noted.The device was inspected with issues noted.Resistance was not encountered when advancing the device and excessive force was not used during insertion/delivery.It was reported that the launcher catheter felt stiffer and larger than a 6f and that the tip of the catheter felt like a razor blade.It was also reported that a dissection of the right radial occurred before the elbow.No further patient injury was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: one 6 fr launcher guide catheter was received for analysis.Deformation noted on the curved section of the device close to the tip.A slight tear was noted on the distal tip segment with braiding exposed.The exposed tip length measured approx.1.8mm, meeting specification of 1.75mm +/- 0.05 mm.The id of the catheter measured 0.070¿ meeting specification of 0.071¿ +/- 0.001¿.The shaft od measured 0.082¿ meeting specification of 0.082¿ +/- 0.001¿.Flattening was evident to the distal tip.No sharp edges were observed on the distal tip.No other damage was noted to the remainder of the device.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: it was stated that the dissection was caused by the launcher device.The physician used a non-medtronic jacky guide catheter for diagnostics first and all was good.The physician saw a lesion in the left anterior descending (lad) artery to treat and was attempting to go up with the launcher device and an exchange length.035" guidewire in place.The launcher came to a stop just before the elbow.Force was not used when it came to a stop.The launcher was withdrawn from the sheath and a shot of dye was administered.That is when the dissection was visible.The dissection was treated with a 3.0 x 80mm non-medtronic peripheral balloon over the guidewire.The patient was brought back 2 days later to have the original procedure completed.Two still images were provided for review.The first image was of a photocopy of the device label.The lot number 224083614 and the device details on the label of the photocopy match what was reported.The second image was of the device.There was no deformation noted to the device.It was not possible to confirm the reported failure mode from the images provided.Intervention ticked (b2).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|