A search for non-conformances associated with the reported part/lot number combination did not reveal any production-related issues relevant to the complaint that occurred during manufacturing of the device.The device was not available for return to the manufacturer for analysis as it was discarded by the user.Three angiographic images and three vascular ultrasound images of the cervical carotid bifurcation area were supplied.The first angio image is a non-subtracted ap still shot at the skull base, showing the eric device deployed from the m2 to the m1 segment.Then subtracted dsas with contrast show the broken eric device with its distal wire across the origin of the ica at the bifurcation, and its proximal end at the level of the facial and lingual trunks.The ultrasound images show the broken eric device in the same position as described above.The cause of the fracture is not evident on these images.Without the return an physical evaluation of the device, the investigation is unable to determine if a condition existed that would have caused or contributed to the reported event.
|