• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CONTOUR; AGENTS, EMBOLIC, FOR TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION CONTOUR; AGENTS, EMBOLIC, FOR TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Fever (1858); Necrosis (1971); Pain (1994); Vomiting (2144)
Event Date 01/25/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported via a journal article "uterine artery embolization in 101 cases of uterine fibroids: do size, location, and number of fibroids affect therapeutic success and complications?" that vomiting, pain, fever, and fibroid expulsion occurred following embolization.Abstract the purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the size, location, or number of fibroids affects therapeutic efficacy or complications of uterine artery embolization (uae).Patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (n = 101) were treated by selective bilateral uae using 500 to 710 lm polyvinyl alcohol (pva) particles.Baseline measures of clinical symptoms, sonography, and mri taken before the procedure were compared to those taken 1, 3, 6, and 12 months later.Complications and outcomes were analyzed for associations with fibroid size, location, and number.Reductions in mean fibroid volume were similar in patients with single (66.6 +/- 21.5%) and multiple (67.4 +/- 25.0%) fibroids (p-value = 0.83).Menstrual improvement occurred in patients with single (93.3%) and multiple (72.2%) fibroids (p = 0.18).Changes in submucosal and other fibroids were not significantly different between the two groups (ps [0.56).Linear regression analysis between primary fibroid volume as independent variable and percentage reduction of fibroid volume after 1 year yielded an r2 of 0.083 and the model coefficient was not statistically significant (p = 0.072).Multivariate regression models revealed no statistically or clinically significant coefficients or odds ratios for three independent variables (primary fibroid size, total number, and fibroid location) and all outcome variables (percent reduction of uterus and fibroid volumes in 1 year, improvement of clinical symptoms [menstrual, bulk related, and urinary] in 1 year, and complications after uae).In conclusion, neither the success rate nor the probability of complications was affected by the primary fibroid size, location, or total number of fibroids.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(6).Firouznia, kavous, et al."uterine artery embolization in 101 cases of uterine fibroids: do size, location, and number of fibroids affect therapeutic success and complications?." cardiovascular and interventional radiology 31.3 (2008): 521-526.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CONTOUR
Type of Device
AGENTS, EMBOLIC, FOR TREATMENT OF UTERINE FIBROIDS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6515810888
MDR Report Key15125995
MDR Text Key296845495
Report Number2134265-2022-07946
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NAJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/28/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-