|
Model Number TG85ML |
Device Problem
Contamination (1120)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/07/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Age, weight, ethnicity: unknown; requested but not provided.Not applicable as the viscoelastic is not an implantable device.Not applicable as the viscoelastic is not an implantable device.The device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device lot history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that white specks were noticed in the left eye of a patient.The ophthalmic viscosurgical device (ovd) was allowed to acclimatize fully to operating room temperature.The procedure was successfully completed.There was no reported patient injury.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: product evaluation of photo: no products were returned.2 images captured during cataract procedures were provided.Analysis of the images shows phenomena in the eye, however due to the quality of the provided images it cannot be determined whether the phenomena are foreign material, air bubbles, or lens material.No issue can be confirmed.Based on the information obtained, there is no indication of product malfunction or product deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: aug 26, 2022.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer¿ yes.Device evaluation: based upon the visual inspection of the returned product, there is no indication that the customer's observation is due to an issue with the healon gv pro product.Therefore, the customer's report is not confirmed by product evaluation.However, additional information in the form of photographs, provided by the customer, confirms material finds in the eye of the patient.The material that was observed in the photographs were not sent for the investigation.However, the customer's narrative is ultimately confirmed.Since the source or origin of the observed material cannot be determined, product deficiency/product malfunction cannot be confirmed.The photograph of the material find in the patient's eye could indicate coring of the rubber perforation membrane during activation of the product.The size and color of the material finds would be commensurate with coring of the rubber membrane.As the material was not returned, then this potential root cause cannot be confirmed.Based upon the possibility that the observed material finds were from coring of the rubber membrane, then the following risk is indicated.The presence of a gray rubber coring particle upon expelling healon solution is a known issue and is addressed in the healon pro family products¿ risk assessment.In-process manufacturing controls and final product controls ensure that healon pro products are clear and free from the type of material finds indicated in this complaint.Based on the information obtained, product deficiency/product malfunction cannot be confirmed.Johnson & johnson surgical vision will continue to monitor this type of complaints per global complaint trending.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|