(b)(4).The customer returned one 145100 dolphin standard water resist hd handle for investigation.The handle was returned with a rusch equiplite metal disposable miller 0 attached to it.The visual examination did not reveal any obvious defects or anomalies, as the device appears typical.All edges/surfaces of the returned blade and handle were examined with no traces of battery fluid leakage, loose pin contacts shell/top piece/unintended metal which could lead to short circuit and high-temperature output from the device that would be able to overheat the handle as reported.The functional inspection was performed per laryngoscope ifu by pushing downward on the blade to release it from the handle.The blade and handle were reattached and disassembled multiple times with no issues observed of overheating.The complaint cannot be confirmed.To simulate the customer reported failure functional testing of the blade was performed with two fresh blades and noted that the handle was working perfectly when a handle was tested with these blades.There were several small scratch marks and a lot of dirt/residue noted on the internal locking mechanism of the handle.These marks reveal that the device has been used multiple times by the end user, and they are indicative that the device was working perfectly prior to this event and has been used many times.During functional testing of the complaint device, the customer reported defect of overheating of the handle was not possible to reproduce after testing with three different blades.There were no anomalies revealed during functional testing that would be able to contribute to handle overheating issue.The device history record for lot code 181201 was reviewed and no issue that could have contributed to the reported failure were noted.The device was manufactured according to release specification.The ifu for this product states, "attach blade to compatible handle.Click into place.To switch on, pull blade up.To switch off, fold blade down.Return to off position after use." the complaint cannot be confirmed.Visual inspection did not reveal any obvious defects or anomalies, as the device appears typical.Functional testing revealed that the blade and handle were reattached and disassembled multiple times, with no issues noted of handle overheating observed.There were no anomalies revealed during functional testing that would contribute to the handle overheating of a handle for an end user in any way.A device history record review was performed, with no issues found that could have contributed to the reported failure.No problem was found with the returned device.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend complaints of this nature.
|