Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this instrument failure was reported as an infection.The healthcare professional indicated this event occurred during surgery, near the patient.No risk or adverse event was reported by the surgeon.The surgery was completed as intended, with no delay.The agent was present during surgery and was able to source a suitable replacement device.The device was not returned to manufacturer and not made available to registered medical assistant (rma) at djo surgical for evaluation.The lot number was not reported; therefore, this instrument could not be linked to a specific device history record (dhr) and the actual date of manufacture cannot be determined with confidence.Complaint database review showed 10 previous complaint but there were no indications that this instrument has a design or material deficiency.Those are 10 - broke/cracked/damaged.The root cause of this complaint is likely attributable to damage incurred from prolonged use and through misuse or rough handling which surgical instruments are subjected to.This is not an event associated with a product failure, malfunction, or issue.There are no indications that this instrument has a systemic design or material deficiency.Therefore, no containment of inventory is required.Event is associated with instrument usage, not a design or manufacturing issue.Rma examination: the reported device was not returned to djo surgical for evaluation.The representative stated that the hospital misplaced the device and are unable to locate it.The complaint will be closed, if the device is returned at a later time, an amendment will be created for the investigation.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
|