• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GIVEN IMAGING VIETNAM CO LTD MANOSCAN; SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GIVEN IMAGING VIETNAM CO LTD MANOSCAN; SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL) Back to Search Results
Model Number 3890
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problems Airway Obstruction (1699); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 05/11/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, the catheter was stuck in a patient's nasopharyngeal area.The catheter was eventually removed after nasal congestion spray (afrin).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Pico-scope test found no issues.Preliminary atp testing revealed that the device passed the calibration and saline bath test.It was reported that the catheter failed calibration.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The evaluation detected an unreported condition: the unit had tpe insulation damage.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MANOSCAN
Type of Device
SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)
Manufacturer (Section D)
GIVEN IMAGING VIETNAM CO LTD
suite 6a, 6th floor
ho chi minh city
VM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
GIVEN IMAGING VIETNAM CO LTD
suite 6a, 6th floor
ho chi minh city
VM  
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key15168886
MDR Text Key297311060
Report Number3007662958-2022-00006
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FFX
UDI-Device Identifier04260167482446
UDI-Public04260167482446
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151086
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/29/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/04/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number3890
Device Catalogue Number3890
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/07/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/30/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-