• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK SUPERA
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Perforation of Vessels (2135); Stenosis (2263); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Vascular Dissection (3160); Embolism/Embolus (4438); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 01/01/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported through the post market clinical follow up (pmcf) report, that the supera stent may be related to the adverse patient effects of thrombosis, embolization, dissection, perforation, occlusion, re-stenosis, revascularization, unplanned amputation / surgical intervention, and the device malfunction of failure to cross.Details are listed in the attached article, titled post-market clinical follow-up evaluation report peripheral self-expanding stents please see the attached post market clinical follow up evaluation report for specific information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event ¿ estimated.The unique device identifier (udi) is unknown because the part number and lot number were not provided.Date of implant ¿ estimated.The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record and similar incident review of the reported lot could not be conducted because the part and lot number was not provided.The reported patient effects of embolism, stenosis, thrombosis, occlusion, dissection, and perforation are listed in the supera peripheral stent system instructions for use as a potential adverse event.A conclusive cause for the reported thrombosis/thrombus, embolism/embolus, vascular dissection, perforation of vessels, obstruction/occlusion, and stenosis and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The treatments appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The patient effect of death and other patient effects reported in the pmcf are captured under separate medwatch reports.Literature attachment: article title "rpt2131801, post market clinical follow-up evaluation report peripheral self-expanding stents".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERA
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 2024168
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key15170549
MDR Text Key297309602
Report Number2024168-2022-08576
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P120020
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/04/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK SUPERA
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN SUPERA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Disability; Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-