Additional information received in d.9., h.3., h.6., and h.10.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.The used infusion manifold was visually inspected and no obvious defect was found.The snap clamp could be opened and closed as needed.The sample was tested with the lab stock components on a calibrated console.Fluid flowed to the infusion line, but no air flowed to the air line in the default setting of 35 mmhg.The auto infusion valve (aiv) manifold was then tested separately.An external pressure source was used to perform a opening pressure test.The pressure was incrementally increased until the valve actuated.The aiv was found to be non-conforming due to the higher than expected opening pressure.Since the aiv subsequently actuated manually after reestablishing the opening during laboratory testing, it¿s possible a fraction of the silicone valve lips self-adhered and potentially contributed to the higher than typical cracking pressure observed.The root cause of the stuck valve could not be conclusively determined.After macro analysis of the returned sample, the most probable root cause of the customer¿s event could be attributed to self-adhesion.Since the aiv subsequently actuated and functioned after reestablishing the opening, it¿s possible a fraction of the silicone valve lips self-adhered and potentially contributed to the higher than typical cracking pressure observed.Action will not be taken for this occurrence as the root cause is not known.After a thorough investigation of this complaint and analysis of complaints of this nature confirm no unfavorable trend for this event.A trend analysis for this lot shows this event to be isolated to a single occurrence.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|