Model Number CMS15-10C-US |
Device Problems
Positioning Failure (1158); Difficult to Remove (1528); Defective Device (2588); Positioning Problem (3009)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/01/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that proximal filter dislodgement and an inability to fully resheath the proximal filter occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) procedure.The vasculature was nontortuous.An introducer sheath was placed into the radial artery and the sentinel cps was advanced.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was deployed in brachiocephalic artery.While articulating the distal end of the sentinel cps, the proximal filter moved from the brachiocephalic artery towards the subclavian artery in an open state.The physician attempted to recapture the proximal filter of the sentinel cps: however, the proximal filter of the sentinel cps could not be fully resheathed.The physician repositioned the proximal filter more proximally in the brachiocephalic artery and attempted to redeploy the proximal filter, however, the proximal filter slider exhibited resistance and the proximal filter would not fully open.The sentinel cps was potentially retrieved from the patient in a partially open state.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that proximal filter dislodgement and an inability to fully resheath the proximal filter occurred.A sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implantation (tavi) procedure.An introducer sheath was placed into the radial artery and the sentinel cps was advanced.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was deployed in brachiocephalic artery.While articulating the distal end of the sentinel cps, the proximal filter moved from the brachiocephalic artery towards the subclavian artery in an open state.The physician attempted to recapture the proximal filter of the sentinel cps: however, the proximal filter of the sentinel cps could not be fully resheathed.The physician repositioned the proximal filter more proximally in the brachiocephalic artery and attempted to redeploy the proximal filter, however, the proximal filter slider exhibited resistance and the proximal filter would not fully open.The sentinel cps was potentially retrieved from the patient in a partially open state.No patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr.: the sentinel cps was returned to boston scientific (bsc) and was analyzed by a bsc quality engineer.Visual analysis revealed a sheathed proximal filter, relaxed articulating distal sheath (ads), unsheathed distal filter, and excessive blood residues along the sentinel cps.A functional test was performed and found that before flushing the sentinel cps, the proximal filter was unable to be unsheathed via the proximal filter slider.Following flushing of the sentinel cps, the proximal filter could be successfully unsheathed via the proximal filter slider.The sentinel cps was left soaking for 24 hours, and when the flushing was performed, excessive blood exited the sentinel cps.After soaking the sentinel cps, the proximal filter was unable to be unsheathed.A microscope test was performed, which found the outer shaft to be stretched.A dissection test was performed using scissors to create a transversal cut on the distal part of the outer shaft.A protruding braid was found on the inner shaft of the sentinel cps.The type of damages observed on the outer shaft in the device indicates that an excessive force may have been applied during the attempt to deploy the proximal filter that may have caused the stretch on the outer shaft.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|