• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SOMATICS, NC. ECT DEVICE THYMATRON SYSTEM IV (SOMATICS); ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY DEVICE FOR CATATONIA, MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, AND B

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SOMATICS, NC. ECT DEVICE THYMATRON SYSTEM IV (SOMATICS); ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY DEVICE FOR CATATONIA, MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, AND B Back to Search Results
Device Problem Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631)
Patient Problems Bradycardia (1751); High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension (1908); Tachycardia (2095)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
As an ethical mandated reporter, in an effort to close the gap between published research and fda acknowledged risks (since the fda allowed manufacturers to market this device without pma or pdp) in human experimentation using heuristic electrical dosing parameters with no clinical or scientific rationale --without the knowledge of the patient or their loved ones, i feel it is necessary to submit this article on behalf of the case-study authors (doi: 10.1186/s40981-020- 00389-6) a 66-year-old, 57 kg, woman with bipolar disorder was scheduled for maintenance ect.She had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder over 9 years earlier.She had undergone 12 sessions of ect under general anesthesia in our hospital.Propofol and suxamethonium were used for general anesthesia in every ect procedure.Ect was effective against the bipolar disorder, and she had achieved excellent clinical response with maintenance ect every 2¿3 months over 9 years in our hospital.With over 100 sessions of ect during the 9 years, no adverse hemodynamic events of note (including bradycardia) had been observed, and no atropine had been administered at any session of ect in our hospital.In addition, ect procedures over the previous 2 months showed no noteworthy events, including asystole or bradycardia.Five years earlier, transthoracic echocardiography had been performed because of abnormalities on electrocardiography (ecg) in the form of incomplete right bundle branch block (irbbb).No abnormalities were identified on echocardiography, with no asynergy of the left ventricle (lv) and an lv ejection fraction of 60¿65%.At this time, treatment with maintenance ect was planned to be continued as usual, along with pharmacotherapy comprising oral olanzapine at 5 mg/day.For the ect session in which the event occurred, no premedication was administered.Preintervention ecg indicated normal sinus rhythm with irbbb.No abnormality of st-t change was observed.A cardiologist performed cardiac examinations and found no issues requiring consideration.No abnormalities were evident from pre-intervention laboratory analyses, including serum potassium concentration (3.6 meq/l).Oral olanzapine at 5 mg was continued on the day of ect.In the operating room, baseline blood pressure (bp) was 161/94 mmhg, hr was 77 beats/min, and peripheral oxygen saturation was 96% under room air.Anesthesia was induced using propofol at 1.0 mg/kg, and then 0.6 mg of suxamethonium was administered.After the induction of anesthesia, hyperventilation (end-tidal carbon dioxide, approximately 30 mmhg) was achieved by manual mask ventilation with 100% oxygen.When muscular relaxation was judged as adequate, bilateral electrodes were placed, and the electrical stimulus for ect was delivered using a thymatoron system iv (somatics; llc, lake buff, il) via bifrontal-temporal electrode placement (electric current, 0.92 a; frequency, 40 hz; stimulation duration, 6.3 s).Immediately after electrical stimulation, systolic bp increased from 144 to 188 mmhg, and hr increased from 81 to 151 beats/min.Tonic-clonic seizures were induced (motor seizures, 55 s; electroencephalographic (eeg) seizures, 73 s).Shortly before seizure termination, hr gradually decreased, and severe bradycardia (5¿6 beats/min) was identified for 15¿20 s (fig.1c, d).The patient was administered 0.5 mg of atropine sulfate, and hr quickly normalized to 78 beats/min.Recovery from ect was uneventful, with no further episodes of asystole or other arrhythmias.A consulting cardiologist indicated that no further evaluation was required and recommended conservative management.The current case showed severe bradycardia, not immediately after the onset of electrical stimulation, but near seizure termination, which was considered to be in the third phase of parasympathetic dominance.Why severe bradycardia was observed on this occasion remains uncertain, as this patient had previously been treated with ect over 100 times without any adverse events.Of course thymatron states that permanent brain damage and permanent memory loss risks increase with the number of treatments, perhaps cardiac risks increase with number of treatments, too.This case report indicates that attention should be paid to adverse cardiac events related to autonomic nerve activity even before such events occur during ect."death model".Fda safety report id# (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ECT DEVICE THYMATRON SYSTEM IV (SOMATICS)
Type of Device
ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY DEVICE FOR CATATONIA, MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, AND B
Manufacturer (Section D)
SOMATICS, NC.
MDR Report Key15192750
MDR Text Key297636496
Report NumberMW5111348
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/08/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-