• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 83787
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Difficult to Remove (1528); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/14/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that coil protruded from catheter tip upon removal.The target lesion was located in a non-calcified abdominal aorta/ internal iliac artery.A 15mm x 40cm interlock-35 was selected for use.During the procedure, it was noted that the coil stopped moving back and forth from about 10cm beyond the contrast catheter and got stuck in the distal part of the catheter.While pushing and pulling, only the push wire was pulled out and the coil was removed from the body together with the contrast catheter.However, it was noted that the coil protruded from the catheter tip upon removal.Per physician's comment, thrombosis has probably developed inside the contrast catheter.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.Unit returned with its original pouch.The unit returned has main coil stretched, as part of overall visual revision.Visual inspection revealed that the main coil was returned inside a cordis catheter.The main coil was stretched, kinked and the interlocking arm was detached.No more damages were found.Microscope inspection revealed that the interlocking arm of the main coil was detached.
 
Event Description
It was reported that coil protruded from catheter tip upon removal.The target lesion was located in a non-calcified abdominal aorta/ internal iliac artery.A 15mm x 40cm interlock-35 was selected for use.During the procedure, it was noted that the coil stopped moving back and forth from about 10cm beyond the contrast catheter and got stuck in the distal part of the catheter.While pushing and pulling, only the push wire was pulled out and the coil was removed from the body together with the contrast catheter.However, it was noted that the coil protruded from the catheter tip upon removal.Per physician's comment, thrombosis has probably developed inside the contrast catheter.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.No complications reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERLOCK-35
Type of Device
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORK LIMITED
model farm road
cork
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6515810888
MDR Report Key15204223
MDR Text Key298603826
Report Number2124215-2022-28674
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier08714729795438
UDI-Public08714729795438
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K133208
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number83787
Device Catalogue Number83787
Device Lot Number0028451737
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/25/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-