• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMERIEUX, SA MEROPENEM MP 32 WW S30

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMERIEUX, SA MEROPENEM MP 32 WW S30 Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 412402
Device Problem Low Test Results (2458)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Intended use: etest® is a manual, quantitative technique for the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility of non-fastidious gram-negative and gram-positive aerobic bacteria and fastidious bacteria.The system comprises a predefined antibiotic gradient which is used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (mic, in ¿g/ml) of different antimicrobial agents against microorganisms tested on agar media after overnight incubation.Description: an internal complaint was initiated following a review of a scientific publication from south africa entitled, "comparison of carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations of oxa-48-like klebsiella pneumoniae by sensititre, vitek 2, microscan and etest" by nana t, et al.This publication noted potential false susceptible ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem results for klebsiella pneumoniae isolates when analyzed with etest® products compared to results obtained with vitek® 2, sensititre, and microscan products.This assessment is for the implicated product of meropenem mp 32 ww s30 (ref 412402).The article presents a study in which the aim was to compare carbapenem mics for 82 oxa-48-like k.Pneumoniae isolates between several methods including etest strips.The data presented in the publication shows that discrepant results were sometimes obtained when comparing the various methods.The proportion of isolates testing susceptible to ertapenem by etest (19/82, 23.1%) differed from sensititre/vitek (0/82) and microscan (2/82, 2.4%) (p < 0.001).For meropenem the 47 proportion of isolates susceptible by etest (31/82, 37.8%) 48 differed from sensititre/vitek (16/82, 19.5%) (p=0.015) and for imipenem they observed inconsistency with the different methods.However, the authors clearly documented a major limitation of this study where the isolates were not analyzed using the reference method, broth microdilution (bmd), to determine the expected mic and interpretation (susceptible/intermediate/resistant).This was a retrospective study performed on isolates that were selected from a list of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales (cre) that were collected between 2017-2021.There is no indication or report in the publication that any results obtained during the study were used for any treatment decisions.There is no indication or report of any adverse events related to any patient's state of health.Note: etest® meropenem mp 32 ww s30 (ref 412402) is not registered for use in the united states.However a similar product, etest® meropenem mp 32 us s30 (ref 412401), is registered for use in the united states (k010363).An investigation has been initiated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation was initiated in response to a scientific publication from south africa entitled, "comparison of carbapenem minimum inhibitory concentrations of oxa-48-like klebsiella pneumoniae by sensititre, vitek 2, microscan and etest" by nana t, et al.This publication noted potential false susceptible ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem results for klebsiella pneumoniae isolates when analyzed with etest® products compared to results obtained with vitek® 2, sensititre, and microscan products.This assessment is for the implicated product of meropenem mp 32 ww s30 (ref (b)(4)).Investigation: complaint trend analysis: global customer service (gcs) performed a complaint trend analysis and did not identify the reported issues as trends for the etest products.Investigational testing: to further investigate the article, the strains used during the study were necessary to perform in-house tests.A material transfer agreement (mta) must be signed between the author and biomérieux, but unfortunately no consensus has been reached between the two parties on the dissemination of future data generated by biomérieux.Therefore, no further testing can be performed at biomérieux.Root cause: the cause for the issue could not be determined.As no strains were submitted, and since a bias related to local epidemiology cannot be excluded, it was not possible to confirm the reported issues or to identify any root cause for the reported issues.Conclusion: the cause for the reported false susceptible etest results could not be determined.No investigational testing could be performed to confirm the results obtained by the publication authors.No trend is observed in the complaints search related to the issue described in the article for etest products etp 32, mp 32 and ip 32.There is no indication of a systemic product performance issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEROPENEM MP 32 WW S30
Type of Device
MEROPENEM MP 32 WW S30
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMERIEUX, SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme 38390
FR  38390
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMERIEUX, SA
3 route de port michaud
la balme 38390
FR   38390
Manufacturer Contact
matthew locus
595 anglum road
hazelwood, MO 63042
MDR Report Key15252991
MDR Text Key305523824
Report Number9615754-2022-00099
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JWY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSF
PMA/PMN Number
K010363
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number412402
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage A
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-