• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED RAYONE SPHERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED RAYONE SPHERIC Back to Search Results
Model Number RAO100C
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Material Opacification (1426)
Patient Problem Visual Impairment (2138)
Event Date 06/20/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
On 10th august 2022, rayner intraocular lenses limited received notification from its brazilian distributor of an event that occurred following implantation of a rayone spheric rao100c.The event description provided states that post-operatively the patient presented with low visual acuity and opacification of the iol was observed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reference (b)(4) has been allocated to this case by rayner.The patient underwent implantation of a rayone spheric rao100c on (b)(6) 2019.Post-operatively, the patient reported low visual acuity and on (b)(6) 2022 examination by the healthcare professional identified iol opacification.The rayone spheric rao100c was explanted on (b)(6) 2022.The patient received an alternate iol during the explantation procedure.The explanted lens has been retained and is being returned to rayner to undergo structural and ultrastructural analysis (scanning electron microscopy - sem and energy dispersive x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy - edx).Rayner has requested additional information from the reporter, including patient medical history, to facilitate further investigation of the event.Primary calcification is inherent.It is due to particular manufacturing processes or packaging interactions.An examination of the literature shows that some manufacturers have had known cases of primary calcification due to an interaction with silicone in the packaging - and more recently, due to phosphate remnants (originating from a detergent) found in the manufacturing process.Rayner has made no material processing or packaging changes that may have negatively affected our iols; we have never had a confirmed case of primary calcification relating to a rayner iol.Secondary calcification affects many manufacturers and is a phenomenon that is not fully understood; it is known that it stems from changes in the eye's environment due to patient comorbidity, secondary surgeries and potentially other, poorly understood interactions: off label use of intracameral alteplase (actilyse) (rtpa), multifactorial, high phosphate content ophthalmic viscoelastic devices, repeated exposure to intracameral air, raised intraocular pressure, excessive post-operative inflammation, complicated, traumatised eyes, as a result of direct contact between the iol surface and the exogenous gas or substance, a metabolic change in the anterior chamber due to the presence of exogenous gas/substance in the eye or an exacerbated inflammatory reaction after multiple surgical procedures, trauma or repeat surgery involved in re-bubbling potentially disrupting the blood aqueous barrier, increasing concentration of calcium ions.
 
Event Description
On 10th august 2022, rayner intraocular lenses limited received notification from its brazilian distributor of an event that occurred following implantation of a rayone spheric rao100c.The event description provided states that post-operatively the patient presented with low visual acuity and opacification of the iol was observed necessitating explantation of the iol.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reference (b)(4) has been allocated to this case by rayner.The patient underwent implantation of a rayone spheric rao100c on 21st may 2019.Post-operatively, the patient reported low visual acuity and on 20th june 2022 examination by the healthcare professional identified iol opacification.The patient medical history received identifies that the patient has diabetes mellitus and is prescribed metformin.The rayone spheric rao100c was explanted on 23rd june 2022.The patient received an alternate iol during the explantation procedure.The explanted lens has been retained and was returned to rayner for evaluation.The explanted lens was sent to a third-party independent laboratory to undergo structural and ultrastructural analysis (scanning electron microscopy (sem) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (eds)).Device analysis was completed on 30th september 2022.Sem and eds analysis revealed a significant deposition of mineral like structures on the surface of the iol consistent with the structure and form of iol calcification.The crystals were composed of calcium phosphate.Primary calcification is inherent.It is due to particular manufacturing processes or packaging interactions.An examination of the literature shows that some manufacturers have had known cases of primary calcification due to an interaction with silicone in the packaging - and more recently, due to phosphate remnants (originating from a detergent) found in the manufacturing process.Rayner has made no material processing or packaging changes that may have negatively affected our iols; we have never had a confirmed case of primary calcification relating to a rayner iol.Secondary calcification affects many manufacturers and is a phenomenon that is not fully understood; it is known that it stems from changes in the eye's environment due to patient comorbidity, secondary surgeries and potentially other, poorly understood interactions: off label use of intracameral alteplase (actilyse) (rtpa), multifactorial, high phosphate content ophthalmic viscoelastic devices, repeated exposure to intracameral air, raised intraocular pressure, excessive post-operative inflammation, complicated, traumatised eyes, as a result of direct contact between the iol surface and the exogenous gas or substance, a metabolic change in the anterior chamber due to the presence of exogenous gas/substance in the eye or an exacerbated inflammatory reaction after multiple surgical procedures, trauma or repeat surgery involved in re-bubbling potentially disrupting the blood aqueous barrier, increasing concentration of calcium ions.As identified in published literature the patient's pre-existing medical condition may be a contributory factor to the onset of post-operative calcification in this case; however, it is not possible to confirm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RAYONE SPHERIC
Type of Device
RAYONE SPHERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED
the ridley innovation centre
10 dominion way
worthing, west sussex BN14 8AQ
UK  BN14 8AQ
Manufacturer (Section G)
RAYNER INTRAOCULAR LENSES LIMITED
the ridley innovation centre
10 dominion way
worthing, west sussex BN14 8AQ
UK   BN14 8AQ
Manufacturer Contact
jodie neal
the ridley innovation centre
10 dominion way
worthing, west sussex BN14 -8AQ
UK   BN14 8AQ
MDR Report Key15258546
MDR Text Key304975831
Report Number3012304651-2022-00047
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05029867690624
UDI-Public(01)05029867690624
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
P060011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/19/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/12/2024
Device Model NumberRAO100C
Device Catalogue NumberRAO100C
Device Lot Number019130606
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/14/2019
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-