• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG COVERA PLUS VASCULAR COVERED STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG COVERA PLUS VASCULAR COVERED STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number AVSL06060
Device Problems Loss of or Failure to Bond (1068); Positioning Failure (1158); Retraction Problem (1536); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 07/22/2022
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the u.S.But, it is similar to the covera plus covered stent products that are cleared in the us.The 510 k number and pro code for the covera plus covered stent products are identified respectively.The lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The device is pending return.The investigation is currently underway.(expiry date: 07/2023).Section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during two stent grafts placement procedure in the common iliac arteries, using the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (cerab) technique, the first stent graft was successfully placed in the common iliac; however, during an attempt to implant the second stent graft, the health care provider (hcp) allegedly experience resistance during deployment and decided to remove the delivery system.It was further reported that an alleged retraction problem occurred resulting in the loss of access site as the guidewire/sheath/device were removed as a single unit.The hcp then decided to halt the procedure and performed a femoral-femoral bypass the following day to conclude treatment.Reportedly, the patient then had three more surgeries, was intubated, approximately three days later the patient expired.The relationship between the device related issues and the patient impact is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the u.S.But, it is similar to the covera plus covered stent products that are cleared in the us.The 510 k number and pro code for the covera plus covered stent products are identified in d2 and g5 respectively.H10: the lot number for the device was provided.The device history records are currently under review.The device was received for evaluation.The investigation is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 07/2023).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during two stent grafts placement procedure in the common iliac arteries, using the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (cerab) technique, the first stent graft was successfully placed in the common iliac; however, during an attempt to implant the second stent graft, the health care provider (hcp) allegedly experience resistance during deployment and decided to remove the delivery system.It was further reported that an alleged retraction problem occurred resulting in the loss of access site as the guidewire/sheath/device were removed as a single unit.The hcp then decided to halt the procedure and performed a femoral-femoral bypass the following day to conclude treatment.Reportedly, the patient then had three more surgeries, was intubated, approximately three days later the patient expired.The relationship between the device related issues and the patient impact is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the u.S.But, it is similar to the covera plus covered stent products that are cleared in the us.The 510 k number and pro code for the covera plus covered stent products are identified in d2 and g5 respectively.H10: the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Additional complaint has not been reported for this lot, previously.Based on evaluation of the sample the inability of an adhesive joint (slide block/tether/diving sheath) to withstand tension force during deployment is confirmed.The reported problems to remove the delivery system and the loss of the access could not be reproduced.The reported use of the device for endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation represents an off-label use.A definite root cause is not yet available and will be documented upon being identified.H10: d4 (expiry date: 07/2023), h6 (device code, investigation, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during two stent grafts placement procedure in the common iliac arteries, using the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (cerab) technique, the first stent graft was successfully placed in the common iliac; however, during an attempt to implant the second stent graft, the health care provider (hcp) allegedly experience resistance during deployment and decided to remove the delivery system.It was further reported that an alleged retraction problem occurred resulting in the loss of access site as the guidewire/sheath/device were removed as a single unit.The hcp then decided to halt the procedure and performed a femoral-femoral bypass the following day to conclude treatment.Reportedly, the patient then had three more surgeries, was intubated, approximately three days later the patient expired.The relationship between the device related issues and the patient impact is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COVERA PLUS VASCULAR COVERED STENT
Type of Device
VASCULAR COVERED STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstr. 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM  76227
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstr. 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key15271852
MDR Text Key298371535
Report Number9681442-2022-00246
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
UDI-Device Identifier00801741106644
UDI-Public(01)00801741106644
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
P170042
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/17/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/22/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/23/2023
Device Model NumberAVSL06060
Device Catalogue NumberAASLE06060
Device Lot NumberANFU3100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight58 KG
-
-